PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1999Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry87 citations

Behaviour and Development of Stunted and Nonstunted Jamaican Children

View Full Paper
JGJulie Meeks GardnerSGSally Grantham‐McGregorJHJohn H. Himes

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In order to examine the mechanism whereby stunted children have poor developmental levels, we compared the behaviour of stunted (N = 78) and nonstunted (N = 26) children aged 12 to 24 months, and examined the relationship of their behaviour to their developmental levels. The effect of nutritional supplementation with or without psychosocial stimulation on the stunted children's behaviour was also examined. The children were observed at home during 4 days over a period of 6 months. The stunted children showed significantly more apathy, and less enthusiasm and variety in exploring, were less happy and more fussy. Caretakers' vocalisations to them were less warm or instructive. Stunted children's activity level, exploratory and happy behaviours were predictive of change in developmental levels measured on the Griffiths Scales, from enrolment to 12 and 24 months later. Supplementation predicted mental age at 12 and 24 months after enrolment, however, it had no significant effect on behaviour.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gardner et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2129ef3932cf0a761e45fchttps://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00497
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper