PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 30, 2003Medicinal Research Reviews409 citationsOpen Access

Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds

View Full Paper
IMIngo Muegge

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The fast identification of quality lead compounds in the pharmaceutical industry through a combination of high throughput synthesis and screening has become more challenging in recent years. Although the number of available compounds for high throughput screening (HTS) has dramatically increased, large-scale random combinatorial libraries have contributed proportionally less to identify novel leads for drug discovery projects. Therefore, the concept of 'drug-likeness' of compound selections has become a focus in recent years. In parallel, the low success rate of converting lead compounds into drugs often due to unfavorable pharmacokinetic parameters has sparked a renewed interest in understanding more clearly what makes a compound drug-like. Various approaches have been devised to address the drug-likeness of molecules employing retrospective analyses of known drug collections as well as attempting to capture 'chemical wisdom' in algorithms. For example, simple property counting schemes, machine learning methods, regression models, and clustering methods have been employed to distinguish between drugs and non-drugs. Here we review computational techniques to address the drug-likeness of compound selections and offer an outlook for the further development of the field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ingo Muegge (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a212b5643972fdedf967aechttps://doi.org/10.1002/med.10041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-CASE1994 · 157 citations
  2. 2Beyond Mere Diversity: Tailoring Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery1998 · 162 citations
  3. 3Design and Synthesis of a Maximally Diverse and Druglike Screening Library Using REM Resin Methodology2001 · 18 citations
  4. 4The Design of Leadlike Combinatorial Libraries1999 · 822 citations
  5. 5PICCOLO: A TOOL FOR COMBINATORIAL LIBRARY DESIGN VIA MULTICRITERION OPTIMIZATION1999 · 23 citations