PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2008Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine174 citations

The Mental Health of US Adolescents Adopted in Infancy

View Full Paper
MKMargaret A. KeyesASAnu SharmaIEIrene J. Elkins

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adopted adolescents are at excess risk for clinically relevant behavioral and emotional problems. DESIGN: We examined whether adopted and nonadopted adolescents differed on quantitative indicators of mental health and the prevalence of childhood disorders and whether differences exist between internationally and domestically placed adoptees. SETTING: Assessments occurred at the University of Minnesota from December 11, 1998, to June 4, 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescents adopted in infancy were systematically ascertained from records of 3 large Minnesota adoption agencies; nonadopted adolescents were ascertained from Minnesota birth records. The final sample included these adolescents with their rearing parents. Main Exposure The main exposure was adoptive status: nonadopted (n = 540), international adoptive placement (n = 514), or domestic adoptive placement (n = 178). OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) clinical assessments based on child and parent reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiant, conduct, major depressive, and separation anxiety disorders; teacher reports of psychological health; and contact with mental health professionals. RESULTS: Adoptees scored only moderately higher than nonadoptees on quantitative measures of mental health. Nevertheless, being adopted approximately doubled the odds of having contact with a mental health professional (odds ratio OR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.48-2.84) and of having a disruptive behavior disorder (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.72-3.19). Relative to international adoptees, domestic adoptees had higher odds of having an externalizing disorder (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.67-4.04). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate mean differences in quantitative indicators of mental health can lead to substantial differences in disorder prevalence. Although most adopted adolescents are psychologically healthy, they may be at elevated risk for some externalizing disorders, especially among those domestically placed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Keyes et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2134dff69db56553c3c7a0https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.162.5.419
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Problem Behavior in International Adoptees: I. An Epidemiological Study1990 · 252 citations
  2. 2Cultural socialization in families with internationally adopted children.2006 · 182 citations
  3. 3Do the Effects of Early Severe Deprivation on Cognition Persist Into Early Adolescence? Findings From the English and Romanian Adoptees Study2006 · 380 citations
  4. 410-Year Research Update Review: The Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Disorders: II. Developmental Epidemiology2005 · 445 citations
  5. 5Conners Teacher Rating Scale1969 · 9 citations