PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1977Circulation Research47 citationsOpen Access

Effects of stroke volume and velocity of ejection on end-systolic pressure of canine left ventricle. End-systolic volume clamping.

View Full Paper
HSHiroyuki SugaShinshu UniversityKYKen-ichi YamakoshiKanazawa University

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how contraction mode affects the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in canine hearts.
  • Canine hearts were fitted with a water-filled balloon to assess end-systolic pressure.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Excised cross-circulated canine hearts fitted with a water-filled balloon
I
Intervention
Ejecting contraction with varying stroke volume and velocity of ejection to a preset constant end-systolic volume (19-37 ml)
C
Comparator
Isovolumic contraction at an identical end-systolic volume
O
Outcome
End-systolic pressuresurrogate

The ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship is only slightly affected by ejection, with contractility being the dominant determinant.

Abstract

To study the effects of contraction mode on ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, we compared the end-systolic pressure of isovolumic contraction with that of ejecting contraction at an identical end-systolic volume. The left ventricle of excised cross-circulated canine hearts was fitted with a water-filled balloon. The balloon was connected to a hydraulic pump that allowed the ventricle to contract to a preset constant end-systolic volume (19-37 ml) from a variable end-diastolic volume. At each of control, enhanced, and depressed levels of contractility, differences of end-systolic pressures of steady state isovolumic and ejecting contractions were evaluated while stroke volume and velocity of ejection were widely varied. The end-systolic pressure in the ejecting contraction tended to decrease by 5-15% from that of the isovolumic beat with increases in either stroke volume to 20-25 ml or peak velocity of ejection to about 800 ml/sec. There was no obvious difference in the results at different levels of contractility. The magnitude of the end-systolic pressure depression due to ejection was, however, relatively small as compared to 4-fold changes in end-systolic pressure due to the changes in contracility. We, therefore, conclude that the ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship is affected slightly by ejection, and that this effect is much smaller than the maximal effect of changing contractility on the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suga et al. (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2147d2f69db56553c3d481https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.40.5.445
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Left Ventricular Pressure -Volume Relationships and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption in the Isolated Heart1961 · 200 citations
  2. 2Controls of ventricular contractility assessed by pressure-volume ratio, Emax1976 · 123 citations
  3. 3Left ventricular wall acceleration and the law of Laplace1970 · 37 citations
  4. 4Load Independence of the Instantaneous Pressure-Volume Ratio of the Canine Left Ventricle and Effects of Epinephrine and Heart Rate on the Ratio1973 · 1,519 citations
  5. 5Active Length-Tension Relations Compared in Isometric, Afterloaded and Isotonic Contractions of Cat Papillary Muscle1970 · 38 citations