PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2014Frontiers in Plant Science143 citationsOpen Access

Uncovering plant-pathogen crosstalk through apoplastic proteomic studies

BDBertrand DelaunoisPJPhilippe JeandetCCChristophe Clément

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Plant pathogens have evolved by developing different strategies to infect their host, which in turn have elaborated immune responses to counter the pathogen invasion. The apoplast, including the cell wall and extracellular space outside the plasma membrane, is one of the first compartments where pathogen-host interaction occurs. The plant cell wall is composed of a complex network of polysaccharides polymers and glycoproteins and serves as a natural physical barrier against pathogen invasion. The apoplastic fluid, circulating through the cell wall and intercellular spaces, provides a means for delivering molecules and facilitating intercellular communications. Some plant-pathogen interactions lead to plant cell wall degradation allowing pathogens to penetrate into the cells. In turn, the plant immune system recognizes microbial- or damage-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs or DAMPs) and initiates a set of basal immune responses, including the strengthening of the plant cell wall. The establishment of defense requires the regulation of a wide variety of proteins that are involved at different levels, from receptor perception of the pathogen via signaling mechanisms to the strengthening of the cell wall or degradation of the pathogen itself. A fine regulation of apoplastic proteins is therefore essential for rapid and effective pathogen perception and for maintaining cell wall integrity. This review aims to provide insight into analyses using proteomic approaches of the apoplast to highlight the modulation of the apoplastic protein patterns during pathogen infection and to unravel the key players involved in plant-pathogen interaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Delaunois et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a215c5ae06b4fc4c1ab9aabhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00249
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The structure and function of a soybean β-glucan-elicitor-binding protein1997 · 225 citations
  2. 2Organelle proteomics: looking at less to see more2003 · 180 citations
  3. 3Is the infiltration‐centrifugation technique appropriate for the isolation of apoplastic fluid? A critical evaluation with different plant species2001 · 240 citations
  4. 4Nitric Oxide and ProteinS-Nitrosylation Are Integral to Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Leaf Cell Death in Rice2011 · 351 citations
  5. 5Towards characterization of the glycoproteome of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit using Concanavalin A lectin affinity chromatography and LC‐MALDI‐MS/MS analysis2011 · 78 citations