PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2013Scientific Reports160 citationsOpen Access

Can we identify source lithology of basalt?

ZYZong‐Feng YangJZJun-Hong Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The nature of source rocks of basaltic magmas plays a fundamental role in understanding the composition, structure and evolution of the solid earth. However, identification of source lithology of basalts remains uncertainty. Using a parameterization of multi-decadal melting experiments on a variety of peridotite and pyroxenite, we show here that a parameter called FC3MS value (FeO/CaO-3*MgO/SiO2, all in wt%) can identify most pyroxenite-derived basalts. The continental oceanic island basalt-like volcanic rocks (MgO>7.5%) (C-OIB) in eastern China and Mongolia are too high in the FC3MS value to be derived from peridotite source. The majority of the C-OIB in phase diagrams are equilibrium with garnet and clinopyroxene, indicating that garnet pyroxenite is the dominant source lithology. Our results demonstrate that many reputed evolved low magnesian C-OIBs in fact represent primary pyroxenite melts, suggesting that many previous geological and petrological interpretations of basalts based on the single peridotite model need to be reconsidered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2170ce1437d1e11ff1a9cehttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep01856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper