PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1977Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology144 citations

Memorability, Word Frequency and Negative Recognition

View Full Paper
JBJohn L. BrownVLVivien LewisAMAndrew Monk

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Brown (1976) has provided an analysis of the effect of the memorability of an item on the confidence with which it is accepted or rejected in a test of recognition or recall. When the subject has no clear recollection of the inclusion of an item in an input list, he is assumed to evaluate its memorability in the context of the experiment before he decides whether to accept or reject it. If the judged memorability is high, the absence of a clear recollection is stronger evidence against the item than if it is low. A specific prediction is that memorable distractors in a recognition test will be more confidently rejected than non-memorable ones. This prediction was tested and confirmed in three experiments in which recognition was tested by 4-category rating. Except in Experiment I, items memorable to individual subjects were identified by administering a questionnaire. For example, in Experiment III forenames of immediate family were assumed to have high memorability. This experiment also included word frequency as a variable. Low-frequency distractors were rejected significantly more firmly than high-frequency distractors: extraction of memorable names enhanced this effect. The relationship of memorability to word frequency is discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2175f7fe297d9d92f1b05chttps://doi.org/10.1080/14640747708400622
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper