Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Cycle accurate DRAM simulations have been the dominating architecture simulation model for DRAM for a long time. Although accurate, its poor simulation speed has not improved for years while a lot of other architecture simulators such as CPU and cache simulators have moved away from cycle-accurate models for better performance. In this paper, we discuss limitations of cycle-accurate DRAM models, through simulation experiments, we show that cycle-accurate DRAM simulator is becoming a dominant part of overall simulation time when paired with modern CPU simulators. We also demonstrate the inherent inflexibility of cycle-accurate models becomes the roadblock for faster simulation speed and integration with other non-cycle-accurate simulation frameworks. Finally, we discuss alternative modeling techniques for DRAM simulation and point out potential pathways to further DRAM simulation technique.
Li et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: