PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2019Proceedings of the International Symposium on Memory Systems11 citationsOpen Access

Rethinking cycle accurate DRAM simulation

SLShang LiRVRommel Sánchez VerdejoPRPetar Radojković

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Cycle accurate DRAM simulations have been the dominating architecture simulation model for DRAM for a long time. Although accurate, its poor simulation speed has not improved for years while a lot of other architecture simulators such as CPU and cache simulators have moved away from cycle-accurate models for better performance. In this paper, we discuss limitations of cycle-accurate DRAM models, through simulation experiments, we show that cycle-accurate DRAM simulator is becoming a dominant part of overall simulation time when paired with modern CPU simulators. We also demonstrate the inherent inflexibility of cycle-accurate models becomes the roadblock for faster simulation speed and integration with other non-cycle-accurate simulation frameworks. Finally, we discuss alternative modeling techniques for DRAM simulation and point out potential pathways to further DRAM simulation technique.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a217d9f69691edd7bab91cfhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3357526.3357539
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Main memory latency simulation2018 · 10 citations
  2. 2DRAMsim3: A Cycle-Accurate, Thermal-Capable DRAM Simulator2020 · 337 citations
  3. 3Memory access scheduling2000 · 971 citations
  4. 4Graphite: A distributed parallel simulator for multicores2010 · 478 citations
  5. 5Using SimPoint for accurate and efficient simulation2003 · 271 citations