PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 17, 2013American Journal of Public Health162 citationsOpen Access

Shared Decision-Making for Cancer Care Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
EMErin L. MeadADArdith Z. DoorenbosSJSara H. Javid

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

To assess decision-making for cancer treatment among racial/ethnic minority patients, we systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence from studies of "shared decision-making," "cancer," and "minority groups," using PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We identified significant themes that we compared across studies, refined, and organized into a conceptual model. Five major themes emerged: treatment decision-making, patient factors, family and important others, community, and provider factors. Thematic data overlapped categories, indicating that individuals' preferences for medical decision-making cannot be authentically examined outside the context of family and community. The shared decision-making model should be expanded beyond the traditional patient-physician dyad to include other important stakeholders in the cancer treatment decision process, such as family or community leaders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mead et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21947b4a40ae00cbaba827https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301631
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper