PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2017Journal of Medical Economics63 citationsOpen Access

Estimated burden of cardiovascular disease and value-based price range for evolocumab in a high-risk, secondary-prevention population in the US payer context

View Full Paper
PTPeter P. TóthMDMark D. DaneseGVGuillermo Villa

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

AIM: To estimate real-world cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and value-based price range of evolocumab for a US-context, high-risk, secondary-prevention population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Burden of CVD was assessed using the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in order to capture complete CV burden including CV mortality. Patients on standard of care (SOC; high-intensity statins) in CPRD were selected based on eligibility criteria of FOURIER, a phase 3 CV outcomes trial of evolocumab, and categorized into four cohorts: high-risk prevalent atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) cohort (n = 1448), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 602), ischemic stroke (IS) (n = 151), and heart failure (HF) (n = 291) incident cohorts. The value-based price range for evolocumab was assessed using a previously published economic model. The model incorporated CPRD CV event rates and considered CV event reduction rate ratios per 1 mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) from a meta-analysis of statin trials by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration (CTTC), i. e. CTTC relationship. RESULTS: Multiple-event rates of composite CV events (ACS, IS, or coronary revascularization) per 100 patient-years were 12. 3 for the high-risk prevalent ASCVD cohort, and 25. 7, 13. 3, and 23. 3, respectively, for incident ACS, IS, and HF cohorts. Approximately one-half (42%) of the high-risk ASCVD patients with a new CV event during follow-up had a subsequent CV event. Combining these real-world event rates and the CTTC relationship in the economic model, the value-based price range (credible interval) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of 150, 000/quality-adjusted life-year gained for evolocumab was 11, 990 (9, 341-14, 833) to 16, 856 (12, 903-20, 678) in ASCVD patients with baseline LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Real-world CVD burden is substantial. Using the observed CVD burden in CPRD and the CTTC relationship, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that, accounting for uncertainties, the expected value-based price for evolocumab is higher than its current annual cost, as long as the payer discount off list price is greater than 20%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tóth et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a219503cdf8429e7e5fd504https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2017.1284078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper