PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 2009The Astrophysical Journal220 citationsOpen Access

The Fractal Density Structure in Supersonic Isothermal Turbulence: Solenoidal Versus Compressive Energy Injection

CFChristoph FederrathRKRalf S. KlessenWSW. Schmidt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In a systematic study, we compare the density statistics in high-resolution numerical experiments of supersonic isothermal turbulence, driven by the usually adopted solenoidal (divergence-free) forcing and by compressive (curl-free) forcing. We find that for the same rms Mach number, compressive forcing produces much stronger density enhancements and larger voids compared to solenoidal forcing. Consequently, the Fourier spectra of density fluctuations are significantly steeper. This result is confirmed using the Delta-variance analysis, which yields power-law exponents beta ~ 3.4 for compressive forcing and beta ~ 2.8 for solenoidal forcing. We obtain fractal dimension estimates from the density spectra and Delta-variance scaling, and by using the box counting, mass size, and perimeter area methods applied to the volumetric data, projections, and slices of our turbulent density fields. Our results suggest that compressive forcing yields fractal dimensions significantly smaller compared to solenoidal forcing. However, the actual values depend sensitively on the adopted method, with the most reliable estimates based on the Delta-variance, or equivalently, on Fourier spectra. Using these methods, we obtain D ~ 2.3 for compressive and D ~ 2.6 for solenoidal forcing, which is within the range of fractal dimension estimates inferred from observations (D ~ 2.0-2.7). The velocity dispersion to size relations for both solenoidal and compressive forcings obtained from velocity spectra follow a power law with exponents in the range 0.4-0.5, in good agreement with previous studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Federrath et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21a67c84d1906bac5fd71ahttps://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/364
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The density probability distribution in compressible isothermal turbulence: solenoidal versus compressive forcing2008 · 284 citations
  2. 2The Density Probability Distribution in Compressible Isothermal Turbulence: Solenoidal versus Compressive Forcing2008 · 514 citations
  3. 3The neutral atomic phases of the interstellar medium1995 · 921 citations
  4. 4The universality of the stellar initial mass function1997 · 537 citations
  5. 5Chaos and Fractals1992 · 1,985 citations