PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2023Scientific Reports44 citationsOpen Access

A machine learning approach to the development and prospective evaluation of a pediatric lung sound classification model

JPJi Soo ParkKKKyungdo KimJKJi Hye Kim

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Auscultation, a cost-effective and non-invasive part of physical examination, is essential to diagnose pediatric respiratory disorders. Electronic stethoscopes allow transmission, storage, and analysis of lung sounds. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to classify pediatric respiratory sounds. Lung sounds were digitally recorded during routine physical examinations at a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic from July to November 2019 and labeled as normal, crackles, or wheezing. Ensemble support vector machine models were trained and evaluated for four classification tasks (normal vs. abnormal, crackles vs. wheezing, normal vs. crackles, and normal vs. wheezing) using K-fold cross-validation (K = 10). Model performance on a prospective validation set (June to July 2021) was compared with those of pediatricians and non-pediatricians. Total 680 clips were used for training and internal validation. The model accuracies during internal validation for normal vs. abnormal, crackles vs. wheezing, normal vs. crackles, and normal vs. wheezing were 83.68%, 83.67%, 80.94%, and 90.42%, respectively. The prospective validation (n = 90) accuracies were 82.22%, 67.74%, 67.80%, and 81.36%, respectively, which were comparable to pediatrician and non-pediatrician performance. An automated classification model of pediatric lung sounds is feasible and maybe utilized as a screening tool for respiratory disorders in this pandemic era.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21b9a6caef8a5f82c001e6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27399-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictors of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children2016 · 107 citations
  2. 2Heart sound classification based on improved MFCC features and convolutional recurrent neural networks2020 · 339 citations
  3. 3Very deep convolutional neural networks for raw waveforms2017 · 344 citations
  4. 4Cardiac Auscultation Using Smartphones: Pilot Study2018 · 49 citations
  5. 5A measured breath: new techniques in pulmonary imaging and diagnosis.1996 · 4 citations