PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 15, 2007Human Resource Development Review85 citations

The Dilemma of Defining International Human Resource Development

View Full Paper
XWXiaohui WangGMGary N. McLean

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

From the beginning of the use of the term human resource development (HRD) to describe our field, there have been struggles over the meaning of the term and, even more broadly, of the field itself. In recent years, there has been increased attention to the question of the field’s definition, in general, as well as attention to the emerging field of national HRD. This article moves this exploration one more step toward an exploration of the dilemma of defining international and cross-national HRD. A beginning definition is offered, not as a definitive answer but to facilitate ongoing discussion in the dialogue on HRD definitions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21c33fcaef8a5f82c00755https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484306296305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1National Human Resource Development in Transitioning Societies in the Developing World: Concept and Challenges2005 · 131 citations
  2. 2Complementarity or competition: the development of human resources in a South-East Asian Growth Triangle: Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore2000 · 73 citations
  3. 3RESEARCHING HRD2010 · 23 citations
  4. 4Human Capital1993 · 4,141 citations
  5. 5Human resource development as national policy: Republic of Korea and New Zealand2003 · 25 citations