PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2012International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery67 citations

Non‐orthogonal tool/flange and robot/world calibration

View Full Paper
FEFloris ErnstLRLars RichterLMLars Matthäus

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many robot-assisted medical applications, it is necessary to accurately compute the relation between the robot's coordinate system and the coordinate system of a localisation or tracking device. Today, this is typically carried out using hand-eye calibration methods like those proposed by Tsai/Lenz or Daniilidis. METHODS: We present a new method for simultaneous tool/flange and robot/world calibration by estimating a solution to the matrix equation AX = YB. It is computed using a least-squares approach. Because real robots and localisation are all afflicted by errors, our approach allows for non-orthogonal matrices, partially compensating for imperfect calibration of the robot or localisation device. We also introduce a new method where full robot/world and partial tool/flange calibration is possible by using localisation devices providing less than six degrees of freedom (DOFs). The methods are evaluated on simulation data and on real-world measurements from optical and magnetical tracking devices, volumetric ultrasound providing 3-DOF data, and a surface laser scanning device. We compare our methods with two classical approaches: the method by Tsai/Lenz and the method by Daniilidis. RESULTS: In all experiments, the new algorithms outperform the classical methods in terms of translational accuracy by up to 80% and perform similarly in terms of rotational accuracy. Additionally, the methods are shown to be stable: the number of calibration stations used has far less influence on calibration quality than for the classical methods. CONCLUSION: Our work shows that the new method can be used for estimating the relationship between the robot's and the localisation device's coordinate systems. The new method can also be used for deficient systems providing only 3-DOF data, and it can be employed in real-time scenarios because of its speed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ernst et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21d4b84c1bee377cecb57chttps://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1427
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimal Hand-Eye Calibration2006 · 303 citations
  2. 2Towards direct head navigation for robot-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation using 3D laserscans: Idea, setup and feasibility2010 · 21 citations
  3. 3Simultaneous robot-world and hand-eye calibration1998 · 298 citations
  4. 4Robust real‐time robot–world calibration for robotized transcranial magnetic stimulation2011 · 29 citations
  5. 5Practical robot calibration with ROSY2004 · 38 citations