PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2017Blood Pressure Monitoring9 citations

Reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and measures of autonomic function

View Full Paper
NMNiamh M. MorrinMSMark R. StoneKHKeiran Henderson

Key Result

Familiarization trials reduced the typical error of 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure recordings from 3.8 to 2.8 mmHg, with ambulatory HRV showing superior reproducibility to resting measures.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=11)

Structured PICO

Do familiarization trials improve the reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and autonomic function measures in prehypertensive and hypertensive adults?

P
Population
11 prehypertensive and hypertensive adults who underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and HRV measurements on four occasions.
E
Exposure
Four occasions of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring, plus 5-min resting measures of HRV and blood pressure variability (BPV)
O
Outcome
Reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, 24-h heart rate variability (HRV) and resting measurements of HRV and blood pressure variability (BPV)surrogate

Familiarization trials are necessary to achieve accurate and reproducible recordings of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate variability in clinical studies.

Abstract

Determining the number of familiarization sessions required for accurate recordings of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and autonomic function is a prerequisite for the appropriate design of intervention studies. The benefit of familiarization trials remains largely unexplored. The objective of the current investigation was to assess the reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, 24-h heart rate variability (HRV) and resting measurements of HRV and blood pressure variability (BPV). Eleven prehypertensive and hypertensive adults participated. Ambulatory blood pressure and HRV were measured across 24 h on four occasions. In addition, 5-min resting measures of HRV and BPV were recorded and analysed. Variability between consecutive pairs of trials was calculated. The typical error induced by ambulatory recordings of systolic blood pressure reduced over time (3.8-2.8 mmHg). The greatest effect of familiarization was observed at night. Ambulatory HRV was more reproducible than resting measures. The most reproducible markers were root mean square of successive differences coefficient of variation (CV): 13.2-10% and high frequency normalized units (CV: 15.2-6.4%), with the percentage of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms showing the poorest reproducibility (CV: 23.9-20.7%). Overall BPV (SD) was more reproducible than the frequency domain low frequency component. Familiarization trials are required for the most accurate recordings of both 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and HRV. Ambulatory HRV provide superior reproducibility to resting measurements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morrin et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Prehypertension and hypertension (n=11). Familiarization trials (repeated ambulatory monitoring) was evaluated on Reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, 24-h HRV and resting measurements. Familiarization trials reduced the typical error of 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure recordings from 3.8 to 2.8 mmHg, with ambulatory HRV showing superior reproducibility to resting measures.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21e011dd2fbe5a98759ff5https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper