PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2004ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)96 citationsOpen Access

Influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the primary care burden and treatment of patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in general practice in Scotland: population based study

FMFinlay A. McAlisterNMNiamh MurphyCSColin R Simpson

Key Result

Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with a higher incidence of heart failure compared to affluent patients (2.6 vs 1.8 per 1000; OR 1.44, P=0.0003) and less frequent follow-up.

Key Points

  • To examine socioeconomic gradients in the incidence, prevalence, treatment, and follow-up of heart failure in primary care.
  • Population based study conducted across 53 general practices with 307,741 patients in Scotland.
  • Included 2186 adults diagnosed with heart failure from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000.
  • Measured comorbid diagnoses, frequency of GP visits, and prescribed drugs.
  • Prevalence of heart failure was 7.1 per 1000 population; incidence was 2.0 per 1000 population.
  • Patients in the most deprived socioeconomic stratum were 44% more likely to develop heart failure (odds ratio 1.44, P=0.0003).
  • Follow-up visits averaged 2.4 times yearly, lower in deprived patients (2.0) compared to affluent patients (2.6, P=0.00009).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=2,186)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
2,186 adults with heart failure from 53 general practices in Scotland, assessed for incidence, prevalence, treatment, and follow-up between 1999 and 2000.
O
Outcome
Comorbid diagnoses, frequency of visits to general practitioner, and prescribed drugs

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with a higher incidence of heart failure and less frequent primary care follow-up, though prescribing patterns remain similar across socioeconomic strata.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 1.44

Absolute Event Rate: 2.6% vs 1.8%

p-value: p=0.0003

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are socioeconomic gradients in the incidence, prevalence, treatment, and follow up of patients with heart failure in primary care. DESIGN: Population based study. SETTING: 53 general practices (307,741 patients) participating in the Scottish continuous morbidity recording project between 1 April 1999 and 31 March 2000. PARTICIPANTS: 2186 adults with heart failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comorbid diagnoses, frequency of visits to general practitioner, and prescribed drugs. RESULTS: 2186 patients with heart failure were seen (prevalence 7.1 per 1000 population, incidence 2.0 per 1000 population). The age and sex standardised incidence of heart failure increased with greater socioeconomic deprivation, from 1.8 per 1000 population in the most affluent stratum to 2.6 per 1000 population in the most deprived stratum (odds ratio 1.44, P = 0.0003). On average, patients were seen 2.4 times yearly, but follow up rates were less frequent with increasing socioeconomic deprivation (from 2.6 yearly in the most affluent subgroup to 2.0 yearly in the most deprived subgroup, P = 0.00009). Overall, 812 (80.6%) patients were prescribed diuretics, 396 (39.3%) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 216 (21.4%) beta blockers, 208 (20.7%) digoxin, and 86 (8.5%) spironolactone. The wide discrepancies in prescribing between different general practices disappeared after adjustment for patient age and sex. Prescribing patterns did not vary by deprivation categories on univariate or multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with affluent patients, socioeconomically deprived patients were 44% more likely to develop heart failure but 23% less likely to see their general practitioner on an ongoing basis. Prescribed treatment did not differ across socioeconomic gradients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McAlister et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=2,186). Socioeconomic deprivation vs. Affluent stratum was evaluated on Incidence of heart failure (OR 1.44, p=0.0003). Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with a higher incidence of heart failure compared to affluent patients (2.6 vs 1.8 per 1000; OR 1.44, P=0.0003) and less frequent follow-up.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21ebc79e220ae9ef492671https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38043.414074.ee
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Social deprivation increases cardiac hospitalisations in chronic heart failure independent of disease severity and diuretic non-adherence2000 · 89 citations
  2. 2Risk factors for heart failure in the general population: The study of men born in 19131989 · 240 citations
  3. 3Evidence of Improving Prognosis in Heart Failure2000 · 558 citations
  4. 4Small area statistics as markers for personal social status in the Scottish heart health study.1996 · 52 citations
  5. 5Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Access to Invasive Cardiac Procedures and on Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction1999 · 686 citations