PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 18, 2000Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences388 citationsOpen Access

Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging

View Full Paper
BCB.J. CaseyKTKathleen M. ThomasTWTomihisa F. Welsh

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Two different attentional networks have been associated with visuospatial attention and conflict resolution. In most situations either one of the two networks is active or both are increased in activity together. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging and a flanker task, we show conditions in which one network (anterior attention system) is increased in activity whereas the other (visuospatial attention system) is reduced, showing that attentional conflict and selection are separate aspects of attention. Further, we distinguish between neural systems involved in different forms of conflict. Specifically, we dissociate patterns of activity in the basal ganglia and insula cortex during simple violations in expectancies (i.e., sudden changes in the frequency of an event) from patterns of activity in the anterior attention system specifically correlated with response conflict as evidenced by longer response latencies and more errors. These data provide a systems-level approach in understanding integrated attentional networks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Casey et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21ef94e8ef4064f24e98a7https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.15.8728
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper