PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1999Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health58 citationsOpen Access

Exposure-response of asphalt fumes with changes in pulmonary function and symptoms

JGJohn F. GambleMNMark J. NicolichNBN J Barone

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines possible associations between asphalt fumes and workshift changes in lung function and symptoms among 170 workers exposed to asphalt fumes. METHODS: The workers were from 5 segments of the asphalt industry, and most of them participated for 2 consecutive workdays. The primary response variables were changes in lung function (measured at the beginning and end of the shift) and incidence of symptoms (measured before, 3 times during, and at the end of the shift). Exposure was estimated from breathing-zone samples of total particulate (TP), respirable particulate (RP), the benzene-soluble fraction of the TP (BSF), volatile hydrocarbons collected on a charcoal tube (VHC), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulfide. Ozone and wet bulb/dry bulb temperature, as a measure of heat stress, were measured as area samples. In addition, daily cigarette smoking was determined by questionnaire. The exposure-response associations were assessed by both parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques. RESULTS: Overall, no consistent association was observed between an acute reduction in lung function or the incidence of symptoms and exposure to asphalt fumes. Concentrations in the neighborhood of the maximum levels constitute no-observed adverse effect levels: TP (<1.5 mg/m3 to maximum 6.2 mg/m3), RP (<0.6 mg/m3 to maximum 1.4 mg/m3), BSF (<0.6 mg/m3 to maximum 1.3 mg/m3), VHC (<8 mg/m3 to maximum 19.8 mg/m3). There were no exposure-response trends with ozone, heat stress, cigarettes smoked, or length of workday.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gamble et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2218cb00d082f62f9709bfhttps://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Standardization of Spirometry — 1987 Update1987 · 3,280 citations
  2. 2The epidemiological importance of intraindividual changes in objective pulmonary responses1987 · 37 citations
  3. 3An Introduction to the Bootstrap1994 · 40,000 citations
  4. 4An Introduction to the Bootstrap.1994 · 882 citations
  5. 5Lung Function Testing: Selection of Reference Values and Interpretative Strategies1991 · 2,520 citations