PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2006IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control230 citations

On the stability of constrained MPC without terminal constraint

View Full Paper
DLDaniel LimónUniversidad de SevillaTÁTeodoro ÁlamoUniversity of SienaFSFrancisco SalasUniversidad de Sevilla

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the stability of model predictive control (MPC) when removing terminal constraints.
  • Characterizes the region where terminal constraints can be omitted based on MPC design parameters.
  • Proves that adjusting the terminal cost can enlarge the domain of attraction of the MPC without constraints.
  • Extends findings to suboptimal solutions, presenting an asymptotically stabilizing suboptimal controller.
  • Identified a domain of attraction for MPC without terminal constraints based on design parameters.
  • Demonstrated that weighting the terminal cost allows reaching a domain of attraction similar to that with terminal constraints.
  • Introduced a practical method for calculating the stabilizing weighting factor for initial states.

Abstract

The usual way to guarantee stability of model predictive control (MPC) strategies is based on a terminal cost function and a terminal constraint region. This note analyzes the stability of MPC when the terminal constraint is removed. This is particularly interesting when the system is unconstrained on the state. In this case, the computational burden of the optimization problem does not have to be increased by introducing terminal state constraints due to stabilizing reasons. A region in which the terminal constraint can be removed from the optimization problem is characterized depending on some of the design parameters of MPC. This region is a domain of attraction of the MPC without terminal constraint. Based on this result, it is proved that weighting the terminal cost, this domain of attraction of the MPC controller without terminal constraint is enlarged reaching (practically) the same domain of attraction of the MPC with terminal constraint; moreover, a practical procedure to calculate the stabilizing weighting factor for a given initial state is shown. Finally, these results are extended to the case of suboptimal solutions and an asymptotically stabilizing suboptimal controller without terminal constraint is presented.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Limón et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a221b5d4482ac792a96e124https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2006.875014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward infinite-horizon optimality in nonlinear model predictive control2002 · 63 citations
  2. 2Suboptimal model predictive control (feasibility implies stability)1999 · 615 citations
  3. 3Nonlinear systems theory1997 · 53 citations
  4. 4A receding-horizon regulator for nonlinear systems and a neural approximation1995 · 366 citations
  5. 5Unconstrained receding-horizon control of nonlinear systems2001 · 288 citations