PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2009American Journal of Roentgenology391 citations

Prospective Comparison of State-of-the-Art MR Enterography and CT Enterography in Small-Bowel Crohn's Disease

View Full Paper
HSHassan SiddikiJFJeff L. FidlerJFJoel G. Fletcher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to prospectively obtain pilot data on the accuracy of MR enterography for detecting small-bowel Crohn's disease compared with CT enterography and with a clinical reference standard based on imaging, clinical information, and ileocolonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study group for this blinded prospective study was composed of 33 patients with suspected active Crohn's ileal inflammation who were scheduled for clinical CT enterography and ileocolonoscopy and had consented to also undergo MR enterography. The MR enterography and CT enterography examinations were each interpreted by two radiologists with disagreements resolved by consensus. The reports from ileocolonoscopy with or without mucosal biopsy were interpreted by a gastroenterologist. The reference standard for the presence of small-bowel Crohn's disease was based on the final clinical diagnosis by the referring gastroenterologist after reviewing all of the available information. RESULTS: All 33 patients underwent CT enterography and ileocolonoscopy, 30 of whom also underwent MR enterography. The sensitivities of MR enterography and CT enterography for detecting active small-bowel Crohn's disease were similar (90.5% vs 95.2%, respectively; p = 0.32). The image quality scores for MR enterography examinations were significantly lower than those for CT enterography (p = 0.005). MR enterography and CT enterography identified eight cases (24%) with a final diagnosis of active small-bowel inflammation in which the ileal mucosa appeared normal at ileocolonoscopy. Furthermore, enterography provided the only available imaging in three additional patients who did not have ileal intubation. CONCLUSION: MR enterography and CT enterography have similar sensitivities for detecting active small-bowel inflammation, but image quality across the study cohort was better with CT. Cross-sectional enterography provides complementary information to ileocolonoscopy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Siddiki et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a222751e8ef4064f24ec6b5https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.08.2027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Extranodal Hodgkin Disease: Spectrum of Disease2001 · 274 citations
  2. 2Assessment of Small Bowel Crohn Disease: Noninvasive Peroral CT Enterography Compared with Other Imaging Methods and Endoscopy—Feasibility Study2003 · 315 citations
  3. 3Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohnʼs disease2010 · 238 citations
  4. 4Active Crohn Disease: CT Findings and Interobserver Agreement for Enteric Phase CT Enterography2008 · 153 citations
  5. 5Interobserver and intermodality agreement for detection of small bowel Crohnʼs disease with MR enterography and CT enterography2010 · 101 citations