PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2017Annual Review of Clinical Psychology582 citationsOpen Access

Controversies in Narcissism

View Full Paper
JMJoshua D. MillerDLDonald R. LynamCHCourtland S. Hyatt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There has been a surge in interest in and research on narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Despite or because of this increased attention, there are several areas of substantial debate that surround the construct, including descriptions of grandiose and vulnerable dimensions or variants, questions regarding the existence of a consensual description, central versus peripheral features of narcissism, distinctions between normal and pathological narcissism, possible etiological factors, the role of self-esteem in narcissism, where narcissism should be studied, how it can be assessed, and its representation in diagnostic nosologies. We suggest that a failure to distinguish between grandiose (i.e., overtly immodest, self-centered, entitled, domineering) and vulnerable (e.g., self-centered, distrustful, neurotic, introverted) presentations of narcissism has led to a less cohesive and coherent literature and that trait-based models of personality and personality disorder can bring greater clarity to many of these important debates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a222e414ae3d5108796ff76https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper