PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001Journal of Psychophysiology107 citations

Correlation Between Heart Rate and the Severity of Motion Sickness Caused by Optokinetic Stimulation

View Full Paper
SHSharon R. HolmesMGMichael J. Griffin

Key Result

Optokinetic stimulation significantly increased heart rates in correlation with increasing subjective ratings of motion sickness (P<.001), driven by increased sympathetic stimulation (P<.05).

Structured PICO

Does heart rate and heart rate variability correlate with subjective ratings of motion sickness during optokinetic stimulation?

P
Population
40 subjects (50% female) exposed to an optokinetic drum rotating at 5 rpm for up to 32 minutes to assess heart rate changes during nausea.
E
Exposure
Optokinetic stimulation (sitting within an optokinetic drum rotating at 5 rpm for a maximum of 32 minutes)
C
Comparator
Resting pre-exposure period
O
Outcome
Changes in heart rate, heart rate variability (LF power, HF power, and LF:HF ratio), and subjective ratings of sicknesssurrogate

Heart rate increases correlate significantly with subjective motion sickness severity due to increased sympathetic stimulation, suggesting heart rate is a useful objective indicator in motion sickness research.

Main Result

p-value: p=<.001

Abstract

Heart rate has been reported to increase during nausea and has therefore been used as an indicator of motion sickness. However, the relationship between heart rate and subjective ratings of motion sickness has received little attention, and the autonomic origins of any increase in heart rate during motion sickness are unknown. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability can quantify the degree of sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation of the heart, as reflected by the low frequency (LF) power and high frequency (HF) power components, and the ratio of LF:HF power (“autonomic balance”). This experiment investigated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability prior to and during the development of nausea. Forty subjects (20 male, 20 female) sat within an optokinetic drum (a visual stimulus) rotating at 5 rpm for a maximum of 32 minutes. Heart rates, measures of heart rate variability, and ratings of sickness were recorded during a resting pre-exposure period and during optokinetic stimulation. Heart rates increased significantly with increasing subjective ratings of sickness (P < .001). This appeared to be attributable to a net increase in sympathetic stimulation of the heart, (P < .05). Sickness ratings were greater for females than males (P = .09), consistent with a significantly greater history of motion sickness reported by females than males over the previous 12 months (P < .02). The findings suggest that a simple measure of heart rate may be a useful indicator of small changes in the degree of sickness that can be of interest in motion sickness research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holmes et al. (2001) studied Motion sickness (n=40). Optokinetic stimulation vs. Resting pre-exposure period was evaluated on Changes in heart rate and heart rate variability prior to and during the development of nausea (p=<.001). Optokinetic stimulation significantly increased heart rates in correlation with increasing subjective ratings of motion sickness (P<.001), driven by increased sympathetic stimulation (P<.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a223080e8ef4064f24ecce4https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.15.1.35
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Temporal stability of heart period variability during a resting baseline and in response to psychological challenge1995 · 36 citations
  2. 2Aviation, space and environmental medicine1987 · 561 citations
  3. 3Studies of Motion Sickness: XVII. Physiological Changes Accompanying Sickness in Man1955 · 31 citations
  4. 4Motion sickness history questionnaire2000 · 19 citations
  5. 5The American Journal of Physiology1897 · 1,140 citations