PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Biofabrication0 citationsOpen Access

Large-scale manufacturing of precisely patterned flexible soft tissue implants with high porosity

View Full Paper
ASAmal ShabazzACAlexandra P ChristensenDGDavid Garvey

Key Points

  • The aim is to validate a manufacturing process for soft tissue implants used in reconstructive procedures, specifically for the nipple-areolar complex.
  • Soft tissue implants were designed and printed in a GMP facility using Formlabs Biomed resins.
  • Post-manufacturing analysis established criteria for architecture and mechanical features.
  • Implants were infused with gelatin methacrylate to deliver biological cues.
  • E 50A implants exhibited a stiffness resembling soft tissue.
  • Porosities of 74.65% and 72.74% were achieved for 0.4 mm and 0.5 mm geometries, respectively.
  • F 80A geometries demonstrated enhanced reproducibility and preservation of features.

Abstract

As improvements in material compatibility are achieved, stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing allows for the prototyping of soft tissue constructs with high reproducibility and precision. To streamline the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval process, clinical-grade manufacturing must be validated. Here, we present a manufacturing process and postmanufacturing analysis for soft-tissue implants used to reconstruct the nipple-areolar complex (NAC). The NAC is a specialized soft tissue structure that influences aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. Physiologically-sized NAC implants were designed and printed in a good manufacturing practice (GMP) facility using Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A (E 50A) and Biomed Flexible 80A (F 80A) resins. Documentation and procedures were established to standardize and control macroporous soft-tissue implant manufacturing. Post-manufacturing classification based on architectural and mechanical features defined the minimum acceptable criteria for future production. E 50A macroporous implants resembled the stiffness of soft tissue, while F 80A geometries showed higher reproducibility and preservation of fine architectural features.SLA printing enabled the patterning of implants with porosities of 74.65% and 72.74% for 0.4and 0.5-mm geometries, respectively. 3D printed implants supported the infusion of gelatin methacrylate for the delivery of biological cues, with a filling efficiency greater than 97%. This manufacturing platform achieves reproducible fabrication of soft-tissue implants that meet both structural and mechanical requirements. Further, the presented methodology can be adapted for a wide range of complex soft tissues to advance regenerative medicine solutions towards regulatory approval and eventual clinical integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shabazz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22672f763171746d545dc7https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ae7697
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Flexible 3D-Printable Materials for Application in Medical Research: A Comprehensive Comparison of Commercially Available Materials2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care2025 · 17 citations
  3. 3Gyroid‐Structured Scaffolds Guide Uniform Ossification and Modulate Vascular Morphology During Rat Calvarial Bone Defect Regeneration2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4Polymer structure-property requirements for stereolithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds2017 · 471 citations
  5. 5Translating Regenerative Biomaterials Into Clinical Practice2015 · 29 citations