PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 13, 2025American Journal of Neuroradiology1 citationsOpen Access

CTA-Based Carotid Plaque Reporting and Data System Classification Improves Risk Stratification for Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events

View Full Paper
LDLimei DengWZWeixiong ZengJYJingjing Yang

Key Result

CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS 4c strongly predicted ischemic cerebrovascular events (OR 17.87; 95% CI 6.09-52.42; P<0.001), improving risk stratification over stenosis severity alone.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=742)

Structured PICO

Does CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS classification improve risk stratification for ischemic cerebrovascular events compared to stenosis severity alone in patients undergoing neck CTA?

P
Population
742 propensity-score matched patients who underwent neck CTA, followed for a mean of 42 months for stroke outcomes.
E
Exposure
CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS classification (incorporating wall thickness, ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, and thrombus)
C
Comparator
Stenosis severity and risk factor-based model
O
Outcome
Ischemic cerebrovascular events (stroke outcomes), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)hard clinical

CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS classification significantly improves risk stratification for ischemic cerebrovascular events over stenosis severity alone, particularly in patients with mild to moderate stenosis.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 17.87 (95% CI 6.09–52.42)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic cerebrovascular events (ICE) remain a leading cause of mortality and disability. The Carotid Plaque-RADS system standardizes plaque vulnerability assessment, but its prognostic value based solely on CTA remains underexplored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 7,228 patients who underwent neck CTA (2019–2024), 1,232 were retrospectively included and divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) yielded 371 matched pairs. Two radiologists independently assessed plaques using CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS, incorporating features such as wall thickness, ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and thrombus. A total of 742 patients were followed (mean 42 ± 18 months) for stroke outcomes. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics, and Cox models were used to assess diagnostic and prognostic performance compared to stenosis severity. RESULTS: Plaque-RADS ≥3 was significantly more common in symptomatic patients (P P P P CONCLUSIONS: CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS offers superior risk stratification for ICE compared to stenosis severity alone, especially in mild/moderate stenosis, and may guide earlier intervention. ABBREVIATIONS: AUC = area under the curve; DFS = disease-free survival; GEE = generalized estimating equations; ICE = ischemic cerebrovascular event; IPH = intraplaque hemorrhage; MWT = maximum wall thickness; Plaque-RADS = Plaque Reporting and Data System; PSM = propensity score matching; RFS = recurrence-free survival

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deng et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Ischemic cerebrovascular events (n=742). CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS classification vs. Stenosis severity alone was evaluated on Ischemic cerebrovascular events (OR 17.87, 95% CI 6.09-52.42, p=<0.001). CTA-based Carotid Plaque-RADS 4c strongly predicted ischemic cerebrovascular events (OR 17.87; 95% CI 6.09-52.42; P<0.001), improving risk stratification over stenosis severity alone.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a226872f4540fbb2453d65dhttps://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper