PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

How open is open? : Data practices in human-centered mobility research

NANegar Alinaghi

Key Points

  • This research explores the role of open data in mobility studies while addressing ethical and privacy concerns.
  • Utilized openly available resources like OpenStreetMap and governmental data for analysis.
  • Collected human-subject data including eye-tracking and motion observations.
  • Discussed anonymization strategies to protect participant privacy.
  • Highlighted the importance of transparency and reproducibility in research practices.
  • Identified limitations of data sharing based on ethical considerations and privacy risks.
  • Reflected on the complexities of applying open science principles in human-centered research.

Abstract

The XMO Lab at the Geoinformation Research Unit at TU Wien builds its research on a strong commitment to open science, with open data forming the foundation of many of our projects. We extensively rely on openly available resources such as OpenStreetMap and governmental open data to study mobility behavior, urban development, and human-environment interaction. These data sources enable reproducibility, transparency, and scalability across diverse urban contexts. At the same time, a significant part of our work involves collecting human-subject data, including eye-tracking, motion, and behavioral observations in real-world and experimental settings. While we aim to make these datasets as accessible as possible, ethical and privacy considerations impose important limitations. We apply anonymization and data minimization strategies; however, certain data types cannot be fully shared without risking re-identification or violating consent agreements. In this talk, we reflect on our current open science practices, including data sharing, reproducible workflows, and methodological transparency. We also critically discuss the boundaries of openness in human-centered research, highlighting the trade-offs between scientific transparency and ethical responsibility. Our goal is to contribute to a better understanding of what “open” can and should mean in data-intensive mobility research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Negar Alinaghi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2268f9763171746d5477a7https://doi.org/10.34726/12219
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Movement Research in the Era of Big Data, AI, and Open Science2026
  2. 2Changing Lanes Toward Open Science: Openness and Transparency in Automotive User Research2024
  3. 3The potential of data pooling through open data infrastructure in motor performance research2025
  4. 4The potential of data pooling through open data infrastructure in motor performance research2025
  5. 5Open science practices in demographic research: An appraisal2024 · 1 citations