PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1997Pain180 citations

Post-operative central hypersensitivity and pain: the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy

View Full Paper
BLB. Duncan X. LascellesJCJ P. CrippsAJAlan J. Jones

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The effect of timing of analgesic drug administration on the severity of post-operative pain was investigated in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy using both subjective visual assessment scoring systems (VAS) and objective mechanical nociceptive threshold measurements using a novel handheld anti-nociceptiometric device. Forty dogs undergoing routine elective ovariohysterectomy were included in a randomised and double-blind study and assigned to one of three groups: (i) pre-operative analgesics; (ii) post-operative analgesics; (iii) no analgesics (saline injections). The analgesic used was pethidine (a short acting predominantly mu-opioid agonist), at a dose of 5.0 mg/kg (intramuscular). The post-operative administration of pethidine resulted in significantly higher sedation scores and significantly lower pain scores in the early post-operative period, but the dogs given pethidine pre-operatively had significantly lower pain scores than both the other groups at 8, 12 and 20 h post-extubation (P < 0.01, ANOVA). Mechanical thresholds measured at the distal tibia demonstrated the development of allodynia at 12 and 20 h post-extubation, and this was significantly prevented by the pre- (P < 0.01 at 12 h, P < 0.05 at 20 h, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn's), but not by the post-operative administration of pethidine. Mechanical nociceptive thresholds measured at the ventral midline (site of surgery) demonstrated post-operative hyperalgesia in all groups; this hyperalgesia was least in the pre-operative pethidine group. In summary, this study clearly shows pethidine to be an effective analgesic in dogs, albeit of short duration of action, when administered post-operatively, and, importantly, that it has a positive benefit in terms of post-operative outcome measures, when administered pre-operatively, possibly as a result of blocking or preventing the development of central sensitisation following surgical stimulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lascelles et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a227bf1f6fb2c59e553e208https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00141-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preemptive Analgesia—Treating Postoperative Pain by Preventing the Establishment of Central Sensitization1993 · 1,692 citations
  2. 2Verminderte Ansprechbarkeit des Blutdruckes auf synthetisches Agiotensin II bei Ratten mit CCl 4 -Leberzirrhose2008 · 2 citations
  3. 3Effects of Phenylbutazone and Indomethacin on the Post-operative Course following Experimental Orthopaedic Surgery in Dogs1989 · 30 citations
  4. 4An electronic method for measuring joint tenderness in rheumatoid arthritis1992 · 37 citations
  5. 5The Clinical Pharmacology of Meperidine—Comparison of Routes of Administration1976 · 75 citations