PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 22, 2007BMJ149 citationsOpen Access

Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in Brazil: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular haloperidol versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine

GHGisele HufECEvandro Silva Freire CoutinhoCAClive E Adams

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether haloperidol alone results in swifter and safer tranquillisation and sedation than haloperidol plus promethazine. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised open trial (January-July 2004). SETTING: Psychiatric emergency room, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: 316 patients who needed urgent intramuscular sedation because of agitation, dangerous behaviour, or both. INTERVENTIONS: Open treatment with intramuscular haloperidol 5-10 mg or intramuscular haloperidol 5-10 mg plus intramuscular promethazine up to 50 mg; doses were at the discretion of the prescribing clinician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was proportion tranquil or asleep by 20 minutes. Secondary outcomes were asleep by 20 minutes; tranquil or asleep by 40, 60, and 120 minutes; physically restrained or given additional drugs within 2 hours; severe adverse events; another episode of agitation or aggression; additional visit from the doctor during the subsequent 24 hours; overall antipsychotic load in the first 24 hours; and still in hospital after 2 weeks. RESULTS: Primary outcome data were available for 311 (98.4%) people, 77% of whom were thought to have a psychotic illness. Patients allocated haloperidol plus promethazine were more likely to be tranquil or asleep by 20 minutes than those who received intramuscular haloperidol alone (relative risk 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.55; number needed to treat 6, 95% confidence interval 4 to 16; P=0.002). No differences were found after 20 minutes. However, 10 cases of acute dystonia occurred, all in the haloperidol alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Haloperidol plus promethazine is a better option than haloperidol alone in terms of speed of onset of action and safety. Enough data are now available to change guidelines that continue to recommend treatments that leave people exposed to longer periods of aggression than necessary and patients vulnerable to distressing and unsafe adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83261243 controlled-trials.com.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huf et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a227fc06a59e2970c53d985https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39339.448819.ae
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rapid tranquillisation of violent or agitated patients in a psychiatric emergency setting2004 · 180 citations
  2. 2Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression2004 · 39 citations
  3. 3Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Intramuscular Olanzapine and Intramuscular Haloperidol in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Schizophrenia2001 · 303 citations
  4. 4Expert Consensus Guideline Series Treatment of Schizophrenia 19991999 · 325 citations
  5. 5World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects2003 · 10,832 citations