PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 2008Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology58 citations

Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony Resulting from Right Ventricular Apical Pacing: Relevance of Baseline Assessment

View Full Paper
GPGianni PastoreFNFranco NoventaPPPiergiuseppe Piovesana

Key Result

Short-term right ventricular apical pacing induced variable left ventricular dyssynchrony, with a significantly higher prevalence and degree in patients with lower baseline ejection fraction (P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=153)

Structured PICO

Does short-term right ventricular apical pacing induce left ventricular dyssynchrony, and how does it correlate with baseline characteristics?

P
Population
153 patients undergoing short-term right ventricular apical pacing evaluated for left ventricular dyssynchrony before and after pacing.
E
Exposure
Short-term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing
C
Comparator
Baseline (before RVA pacing)
O
Outcome
Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony measured by the time between the shortest and longest electromechanical delays in the five basal LV segments (intra-LV) using Tissue Doppler echocardiographysurrogate

Right ventricular apical pacing induces variable degrees of left ventricular dyssynchrony, which is more pronounced in patients with higher baseline dyssynchrony, more dilated left ventricles, and lower ejection fractions.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony in patients undergoing short-term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing and correlation with baseline echocardiographic and clinical characteristics. BACKGROUND: RVA pacing causes abnormal ventricular depolarization that may lead to mechanical LV dyssynchrony. The relationships between pacing-induced LV dyssynchrony and baseline echocardiographic and clinical variables have not been fully clarified. METHODS: Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed in 153 patients before and after RVA pacing. LV dyssynchrony was measured by the time between the shortest and longest electromechanical delays in the five basal LV segments (intra-LV). The prevalence and degree of LV dyssynchrony after RVA pacing was evaluated in three groups: baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) or=55%. The intrapatient effect of RVA pacing was determined as the percent increase in intra-LV value (Deltaintra-LV%). The pacing-induced intra-LV was correlated with baseline variables. RESULTS: The prevalence and degree of LV dyssynchrony after RVA pacing was significantly higher in patients with lower LVEF (P < 0.001). DeltaIntra-LV% was inversely correlated with baseline intra-LV and LVEF (B =-2.6, B =-4.2, P < 0.001). Baseline intra-LV and LV end-systolic volume correlated positively with intra-LV after RVA pacing (B = 0.49, B = 0.6, P < 0.001), whereas LVEF showed an inverse correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of LV dyssynchrony induced by RVA is variable. Patients with higher baseline LV dyssynchrony, more dilated LV, and more depressed LVEF showed a higher degree of LV dyssynchrony during pacing. These findings may assume importance in predicting the risk of heart failure in pacemaker patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pastore et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing right ventricular apical pacing (n=153). Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing vs. Baseline (before pacing) was evaluated on Left ventricular dyssynchrony (time between shortest and longest electromechanical delays in five basal LV segments) (p=<0.001). Short-term right ventricular apical pacing induced variable left ventricular dyssynchrony, with a significantly higher prevalence and degree in patients with lower baseline ejection fraction (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2281bc6bfc8575acb73a94https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01209.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High prevalence of left ventricular systolic and diastolic asynchrony in patients with congestive heart failure and normal QRS duration2002 · 618 citations
  2. 2Evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular pacing in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction2007 · 55 citations
  3. 3The Clinical Implications of Cumulative Right Ventricular Pacing in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial II2005 · 349 citations
  4. 4Dual-Chamber Pacing or Ventricular Backup Pacing in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator2002 · 2,062 citations
  5. 5Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Doppler Derived Myocardial Performance Index in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction:2003 · 108 citations