PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1979AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology35 citations

Comparison of plethysmographic methods with pulsed Doppler blood flowmetry

View Full Paper
BLB. I. LevyCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de NancyWVW. ValladaresAGA GhaemHôpital Fernand-Widal

Structured PICO

How do water plethysmography, strain gauge plethysmography, and pulsed Doppler flowmetry compare in measuring hand blood flow?

P
Population
Individuals undergoing hand blood flow measurement at rest, with local warming, and with local cooling
I
Intervention
Water plethysmography (WP), mercury-in-rubber strain gauge plethysmography (SG), and pulsed Doppler flowmetry (D)
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and accuracy of blood flow measurementsurrogate

Water plethysmography is the most sensitive and accurate method for measuring hand blood flow, while pulsed Doppler flowmetry offers precise instantaneous arterial flow measurement without venous occlusion.

Abstract

Hand blood flow was measured at rest, with local warming, and with local cooling. Three methods were simultaneously used: water plethysmography (WP), mercury-in-rubber strain gauge plethysmography (SG), and pulsed Döppler flowmetry (D). Of these, water plethysmography is the most sensitive and accurate; strain gauge plethysmography is simpler but less accurate; and pulsed Döppler flowmetry precisely measures instantaneous arterial blood flow without venous occlusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Levy et al. (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22829fb65eef78bdff8bf0https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1979.236.6.h899
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper