PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1996Journal of The Electrochemical Society55 citations

Electrodeposition and Stripping of Lithium and Sodium on Inert Electrodes in Room Temperature Chloroaluminate Molten Salts

View Full Paper
BPBernard J. PiersmaDRDavid M. RyanESEric R. Schumacher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The demonstration of a stable, reversible alkali metal anode is an important step in the development of practical secondary batteries using room temperature chloroaluminate molten salts as electrolytes. Such melts are made by mixing 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride (EMICl) with aluminum chloride, and can be Lewis buffered by adding LiCl or NaCl. It has been shown previously that protons added to a sodium chloride buffered melt as 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hydrogen dichloride provide a more negative voltage window and nearly reversible deposition‐stripping behavior for sodium. While is a proven proton source and also enhances lithium deposition and stripping, its stability in the melt is limited by the rapid loss of HCl(g). We report here that triethanolamine ⋅ hydrogen chloride is effective in widening the voltage window, allows the plating and stripping of both lithium and sodium, and is stable in buffered melts for months. A study of various potential proton donors suggests that deprotonation of one ethanolic group of triethanolamine ⋅ HCl is responsible for the effect. A few other reagents also give this effect, but react more slowly or are more difficult to handle. Plated sodium appears to be more stable in this melt system than lithium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piersma et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a229ac3b95e3d1e3614a537https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1836557
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper