PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 14, 2003Circulation115 citationsOpen Access

Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
FSFrancesco SaiaPLPedro A. LemosCLChi‐Hang Lee

Key Result

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction was safe, with 0% angiographic restenosis at 6 months.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=96)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation prevent major adverse cardiac events and restenosis in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
96 patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous recanalization and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation, followed for a mean of 218 days.
E
Exposure
Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation
O
Outcome
Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, reintervention)composite

Routine use of sirolimus-eluting stents in ST-elevation myocardial infarction appears safe and effectively prevents angiographic restenosis at 6 months.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have recently been proven to reduce restenosis and reintervention compared with bare stents. Safety and effectiveness of SES in acute myocardial infarction remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since April 16, 2002, a policy of routine SES implantation has been instituted in our hospital, with no clinical or anatomic restrictions, as part of the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) registry. During 6 months of enrollment, 96 patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction underwent percutaneous recanalization and SES implantation; these patients comprise the study population. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, reintervention) was evaluated. Six-month angiographic follow-up was scheduled per protocol. At baseline, diabetes mellitus was present in 12.5% and multivessel disease in 46.9%. Primary angioplasty was performed in 89 patients (92.7%). Infarct location was anterior in 41 (42.7%) of the cases, and 12 patients (12.5%) had cardiogenic shock. Postprocedural TIMI-3 flow was achieved in 93.3% of the cases. In-hospital mortality was 6.2%. One patient (1.1%) had reinfarction and target lesion reintervention the first day as a result of distal dissection and acute vessel occlusion. During follow-up (mean follow-up of 218+/-75 days), 1 patient died (1.1%), no patient had recurrent myocardial infarction, and there were no additional reinterventions. No early or late stent thromboses were documented. At angiographic follow-up (70%), late loss was -0.04+/-0.25, and no patient presented angiographic restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction was safe without documented angiographic restenosis at 6 months.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saia et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (n=96). Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, reintervention). Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction was safe, with 0% angiographic restenosis at 6 months.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a229bcf65451dc9090df9eahttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000096053.87580.cd
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper