PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 25, 2013Political Psychology9 citations

Wild Analysis in Politics

View Full Paper
KTKenneth R. Thomas

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This commentary provides a critical discussion of C rouse and S talker's (2007) attempt to psychoanalyze right‐wing authoritarian beliefs. The psychological inventory used by C rouse and S talker for this purpose, The R ight‐ W ing A uthoritarian S cale ( A ltemeyer, 1998), has dubious validity characteristics, and the conclusions reached by C rouse and S talker regarding the origins and characteristics of right‐wing political beliefs and attitudes may be more reflective of the authors' political prejudices than of a serious psychoanalytic study of different personality structures. In the present article, the author demonstrates not only the flaws associated with the measuring instrument used, but also the left‐wing biases in the C rouse and S talker analysis. Unfortunately, these prejudices against individuals with conservative political beliefs may be extensively present in the psychology and psychoanalytic communities and serve neither an appropriate clinical nor scientific purpose.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kenneth R. Thomas (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22a466e4d98b33c2d2be3bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper