PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2014American Economic Review405 citations

Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality

View Full Paper
JGJeremy GreenwoodNGNezih GunerGKGeorgi Kocharkov

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Has there been an increase in positive assortative mating? Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality. In particular, if matching in 2005 between husbands and wives had been random, instead of the pattern observed in the data, then the Gini coefficient would have fallen from the observed 0.43 to 0.34, so that income inequality would be smaller. Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Greenwood et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22dfb50b4d5f457f207d0ehttps://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.348
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper