PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 18, 1997Circulation256 citations

Endothelium-Dependent Dilatation Is Impaired in Young Healthy Subjects With a Family History of Premature Coronary Disease

View Full Paper
PCPeter ClarksonDCDavid S. CelermajerAPAmanda J. Powe

Key Result

Healthy young adults with a family history of premature coronary disease had significantly impaired flow-mediated dilatation compared to matched controls (4.9% vs 8.3%, P<0.005).

Key Points

  • To investigate the endothelial function in young adults with a family history of premature coronary artery disease.
  • Measured brachial artery diameter and flow-mediated dilatation in healthy young relatives of CAD patients using high-resolution vascular ultrasound.
  • Compared measurements with age- and sex-matched control subjects.
  • Categorized family history subjects based on the presence of cholesterol levels and cardiovascular risk factors.
  • Family history group had significantly impaired flow-mediated dilatation (4.9% vs 8.3%, P<.005).
  • Those with unaffected cardiovascular profiles showed the most significant impairment (2.9% vs 8.3%, P=.026).
  • No significant difference in response to glyceryl trinitrate between groups.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=100)

Structured PICO

Does a family history of premature coronary artery disease impair endothelium-dependent dilatation in young healthy subjects?

P
Population
100 healthy young adults (50 with a family history of premature CAD and 50 age- and sex-matched controls) who were lifelong nonsmokers, non-diabetic, and non-hypertensive.
E
Exposure
Family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD in male relative <=45 years or female relative <=55 years)
C
Comparator
Healthy control subjects matched for age and sex without a family history of premature CAD
O
Outcome
Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery measured by high-resolution external vascular ultrasoundsurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 4.9% vs 8.3%

p-value: p=<.005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) in a first-degree relative is an independent risk factor for coronary disease. Both genetic and environmental influences are likely to be responsible and may interact, but their relative importance is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied endothelial function in 50 first-degree relatives (31 men, 19 women; mean age, 25+/-8 years) of patients (men 4.2 mmol/L (group A, n=10) had mildly impaired FMD compared with control subjects (5.5+/-5.1% versus 8.3+/-3.5%). In others whose affected relative had coronary risk factors (group B, n=24), FMD was also only slightly reduced (6.2+/-4.8% versus 8.3+/-3.5%). In contrast, subjects with no risk factors and whose affected relative had a normal cardiovascular risk factor profile (group C, n=16) had markedly impaired FMD (2.9+/-3.7% versus 8.3+/-3.5%). Although ANOVA of the three family history subgroups did not reach statistical significance (F=2.55, P=.09), pairwise analysis showed that FMD in group C was significantly impaired compared with group B (P=.026). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy young adults with a family history of premature coronary disease may have impaired endothelium-dependent dilatation, even in the absence of other cardiovascular risk factors. Those subjects, who were free of risk factors and whose affected first-degree relative was free of risk factors, had the most impaired endothelial function, suggesting a genetic influence on early arterial physiology that may be relevant to later clinical disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clarkson et al. (1997) conducted a case-control in Family history of premature coronary artery disease (n=100). Family history of premature coronary artery disease vs. Healthy control subjects matched for age and sex was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) (p=<.005). Healthy young adults with a family history of premature coronary disease had significantly impaired flow-mediated dilatation compared to matched controls (4.9% vs 8.3%, P<0.005).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22e8d3470a090836c46b09https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3378
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper