PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2003Archives of Internal Medicine98 citations

Effectiveness of Amiodarone for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm

View Full Paper
LSLuz María Letelier SKUKamol UdolJEJavier Ena

Key Result

Amiodarone effectively converted atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, yielding a relative risk of 4.33 (95% CI 2.76-6.77) for AF >48 hours and 1.40 (95% CI 1.25-1.57) for AF ≤48 hours.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review

Structured PICO

Does amiodarone improve conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
Systematic review of 21 randomized trials evaluating amiodarone versus placebo, digoxin, or calcium channel blockers for converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period.
I
Intervention
Amiodarone
C
Comparator
Placebo, digoxin, or calcium channel blockers
O
Outcome
Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period

Amiodarone is highly effective for converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, with a number needed to treat of 4 regardless of AF duration.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 4.33 (95% CI 2.76–6.77)

Absolute Risk Reduction: 27%

Number Needed to Treat: 4

Limitations

  • Safety data are too scarce for definitive conclusions.
  • Safety data are too scarce for definitive conclusions

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although clinicians sometimes choose amiodarone to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm, no current and comprehensive systematic review has summarized its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of amiodarone in converting AF to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period. METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a systematic search for randomized trials in databases, complemented by hand searches and contact with experts. Selected trials compared amiodarone with placebo, digoxin, or calcium channel blockers for conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Reviewers evaluated the methodology and extracted data from each primary study. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met eligibility criteria. Duration of AF proved to be a source of heterogeneity, leading to 2 analyses. The relative risk (RR) for achieving sinus rhythm was 4.33 (95% confidence interval CI, 2.76-6.77) for trials with mean AF duration of greater than 48 hours and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.25-1.57) for those with AF of 48 hours or less. The risk differences for these 2 groups were 27% and 26%, respectively, yielding a number needed to treat of 4 for both groups. The low control event rate among trials with long duration of AF, compared with that of trials with a duration of 48 hours or less, explained the difference in the RR for conversion. We found that the size of the left atrium, presence of cardiovascular disease, and protocols of amiodarone administration did not influence the magnitude of effect. Serious adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone is effective for converting AF to sinus rhythm in a wide range of patients. Although use of amiodarone is apparently safe, safety data are too scarce for definitive conclusions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S et al. (2003) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone vs. Placebo, digoxin, or calcium channel blockers was evaluated on Conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (RR 4.33, 95% CI 2.76-6.77). Amiodarone effectively converted atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, yielding a relative risk of 4.33 (95% CI 2.76-6.77) for AF >48 hours and 1.40 (95% CI 1.25-1.57) for AF ≤48 hours.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a230d3c3bf314e836cb2c5dhttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.7.777
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper