PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2003Circulation63 citationsOpen Access

Interaction Between Soluble Thrombomodulin and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in Predicting Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

View Full Paper
KWKenneth K. WuNANena AleksicCBChristie M. Ballantyne

Key Result

The combination of lower tertile sTM and upper tertile sICAM significantly increased the risk of a CHD event compared to upper sTM and lower sICAM (RR 4.66; 95% CI 1.89-11.46; P=0.038 for interaction).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,043)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the interaction between soluble thrombomodulin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 predict the risk of coronary heart disease?

P
Population
1,043 ARIC participants (317 incident CHD cases and 726 non-cases) evaluated for the interaction between sTM and sICAM in predicting CHD risk.
E
Exposure
Soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) and soluble intercellular adhesive molecule-1 (sICAM) levels (evaluated by tertiles)
C
Comparator
Different tertiles of sTM and sICAM
O
Outcome
Incident coronary heart disease (CHD) eventshard clinical

An upper tertile of sICAM significantly increases the risk of a CHD event only when sTM is in the lower tertile, demonstrating a significant interaction between these biomarkers in predicting CHD risk.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 4.66 (95% CI 1.89–11.46)

p-value: p=0.038 for interaction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from previous ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) analyses indicate that soluble intercellular adhesive molecule-1 (sICAM) and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) levels are associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in an opposite direction. A high sICAM level increases the risk of CHD, whereas a high level of sTM has a lower risk of CHD. It was unclear whether there was an interaction between sTM and sICAM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a nested case-cohort design, we measured sTM and sICAM in 317 incident CHD cases and 726 non-cases from the ARIC participants. Consistent with our previous reports, sICAM values in the upper versus the lower tertile increased the risk of CHD event by approximately 2-fold (95% confidence interval CI, 1.46 to 2.87) whereas sTM values in the lower versus the upper tertile increased CHD risk by approximately 4-fold (95% CI, 2.80 to 5.74). Interaction between these 2 parameters was determined by weighted Cox proportional hazard regression. A significant interaction (P=0.038) was noted. Combinatorial analysis shows a significant increase in CHD risk ratio (RR) (4.66, 95% CI, 1.89 to 11.46) of the lower sTM/upper sICAM group versus the upper sTM/lower sICAM group. Individuals whose sTM values were in the upper tertile had a RR below 1, even when sICAM were in the upper tertile. The RR of lower tertile sTM was increased by sICAM in a tertile-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Weighted Cox proportional hazard analysis shows a significant interaction between sTM and sICAM in predicting risk of CHD event. Combinatorial analysis reveals that an upper tertile sICAM had a significant increase in the risk of a CHD event only when sTM was in the lower tertile.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=1,043). Lower sTM and upper sICAM levels vs. Upper sTM and lower sICAM levels was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (CHD) event (RR 4.66, 95% CI 1.89-11.46, p=0.038 for interaction). The combination of lower tertile sTM and upper tertile sICAM significantly increased the risk of a CHD event compared to upper sTM and lower sICAM (RR 4.66; 95% CI 1.89-11.46; P=0.038 for interaction).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a231b8e79e2b642a7fb212bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000064894.97094.4f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper