PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2013Physiological Reports10 citationsOpen Access

Forearm vascular responses to mental stress in healthy older adults

View Full Paper
MHMatthew J. HeffernanHPHardikkumar PatelMMMatthew D. Muller

Key Result

Older adults exhibited impaired forearm (-2% vs 31%) and cutaneous (2% vs 31%) vascular conductance in response to mental stress compared to young adults.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=24)

Structured PICO

Does healthy aging impair forearm and cutaneous vasodilation in response to mental stress?

P
Population
24 healthy adults (13 young, mean age 27; 11 older, mean age 62) assessed for vascular responses to a 3-minute bout of mental stress.
E
Exposure
3-min bout of mental stress (verbal mental arithmetic) in the supine posture
C
Comparator
Young adults (for the older adult group) and baseline resting state
O
Outcome
Changes from baseline in forearm vascular conductance (FVC) and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during mental stresssurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: -2% vs 31%

Abstract

Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) increases in response to mental stress (verbal mental arithmetic) in young people. However, the effect of healthy aging and mental stress on FVC is unknown. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FVC and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) would be attenuated in older adults compared to young adults. In 13 young (27 ± 1 year) and 11 older (62 ± 1 year) subjects, we quantified heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), FVC (Doppler ultrasound), and CVC (laser Doppler flowmetry) in response to a 3-min bout of mental stress in the supine posture. Changes from baseline were compared between groups and physiological variables were also correlated. Older adults had a blunted HR response to mental stress (Δ = 7 ± 2 vs. 14 ± 2 beats/min) but ΔMAP was comparable between groups (Δ = 11 ± 2 mmHg vs. 9 ± 1). During the third minute of mental stress, the %ΔFVC (-2 ± 5 vs. 31 ± 12%) and %ΔCVC (2 ± 6 vs. 31 ± 15%) were both impaired in older adults compared to young subjects. There was no relationship between ΔHR and %ΔCVC in either group, but there was a positive relationship between ΔHR and %ΔFVC in both young subjects (R = 0.610, P < 0.027) and older subjects (R = 0.615, P < 0.044), such that larger tachycardia was associated with higher forearm vasodilation. These data indicate that older adults have impaired forearm vasodilation in response to mental stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heffernan et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=24). Older age vs. Young adults was evaluated on Change in forearm vascular conductance (%ΔFVC) during the third minute of mental stress. Older adults exhibited impaired forearm (-2% vs 31%) and cutaneous (2% vs 31%) vascular conductance in response to mental stress compared to young adults.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a231bbc4067f161e4fb16ebhttps://doi.org/10.1002/phy2.180
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper