PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2020Future Healthcare Journal21 citationsOpen Access

The impact of an acute chest pain pathway on the investigation and management of cardiac chest pain

View Full Paper
MSMark SweeneyGBGillian BleezeSSSarah Storey

Key Result

Implementation of an acute chest pain pathway reduced emergency department admissions for chest pain (19.0% vs 34.2%; p<0.0001) and significantly decreased time to cardiology transfer.

Study Design

Type

Observational

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does the implementation of an acute chest pain pathway improve the efficiency of management and reduce length of stay in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain?

P
Population
Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain.
E
Exposure
Acute chest pain pathway including a management algorithm, short-stay heart assessment centre, and immediate transfer policy for acute coronary syndrome patients
C
Comparator
Standard care prior to pathway implementation
O
Outcome
Admissions from the ED with chest pain, time to cardiology transfer, time to angiography, and length of stay

Implementation of a dedicated acute chest pain pathway significantly improves healthcare efficiency by reducing ED admissions, time to angiography, and overall length of stay.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 19% vs 34.2%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) presentation with chest pain accounts for approximately 20% of acute hospital admissions, and delays in the investigation and management of these patients increase the pressure on emergency and medical departments. We implemented a pathway within our trust to improve the efficiency of acute chest pain management. This included the development of a chest pain management algorithm, a short-stay heart assessment centre and a policy to immediately transfer acute coronary syndrome patients to cardiology. The introduction of the chest pain pathway resulted in fewer admissions from the ED with chest pain (34.2% vs 19.0%; p<0.0001), a reduction in time from ED attendance to cardiology transfer (9.3 hours vs 5.7 hours; p<0.0001) and a reduction in time to angiography (62.5 hours vs 26.6 hours; p<0.0001). Length of stay was reduced for cardiology patients (4.7 days vs 2.4 days, p<0.001) and mean length of stay for all patients attending ED with chest pain was reduced by 8.3 hours (27.5 hours vs 19.1 hours; p<0.0001). The changes have significantly improved the management of acute chest pain within our trust and we would suggest that adoption of these changes in other trusts could significantly improve the quality of the care for these patients throughout the NHS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sweeney et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Acute chest pain. Acute chest pain pathway vs. Standard care before pathway implementation was evaluated on Admissions from the ED with chest pain (p=<0.0001). Implementation of an acute chest pain pathway reduced emergency department admissions for chest pain (19.0% vs 34.2%; p<0.0001) and significantly decreased time to cardiology transfer.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a233091a96f974f77b6874ehttps://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper