PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 14, 2021ACS Catalysis132 citations

Review of Sulfur Promotion Effects on Metal Oxide Catalysts for NOx Emission Control

View Full Paper
RXRenyi XieLMLei MaZLZihao Li

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Sulfur poisoning is a common problem causing catalyst deactivation during the industrial catalytic process. However, for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia (NH3-SCR) technology, the formation of sulfate species from SO2 in flue gas could remarkably improve NH3-SCR performance by adjusting the surface acidity of the metal oxides. This Review systematically summarizes recent advances concerning sulfur promotion roles of metal oxide catalysts for the NH3-SCR reaction. First, the effects of sulfation treatment on the properties of sulfate species are discussed and compared in detail. The synthesis procedures and the critical parameters of gas-phase and liquid-phase methods are introduced. Second, it is tentative to conclude how the sulfation treatments coordinate acid and metal sites and propose a comprehensive overview of the reaction mechanisms over sulfated catalysts. Subsequently, it summarizes the effective methods to construct appropriate acidity and reducibility of sulfated metal oxides by exposing crystal planes and creating specific structures, including CeO2-, Fe2O3-, V2O5-, and CuO-based catalysts. The corresponding reaction pathways are also deliberated over specific catalysts. Finally, current scientific issues and prospects of sulfated catalysts are put forward, and other acidification methods are supposed to improve the surface acidity effectively. For future NH3-SCR technology, the experimental and mechanistic discussions in this Review will be beneficial to understand reaction chemistry and design highly efficient NH3-SCR catalysts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a238be3a9ac004fba9ed54ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c02197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sulfur dioxide removal: An overview of regenerative flue gas desulfurization and factors affecting desulfurization capacity and sorbent regeneration2020 · 159 citations
  2. 2Identification of two types of Cu sites in Cu/SSZ-13 and their unique responses to hydrothermal aging and sulfur poisoning2015 · 207 citations
  3. 3Catalytic performance and mechanistic evaluation of sulfated CeO2 cubes for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia2021 · 49 citations
  4. 4Ce–Si Mixed Oxide: A High Sulfur Resistant Catalyst in the NH3–SCR Reaction through the Mechanism-Enhanced Process2021 · 142 citations
  5. 5The Absence of Oxygen in Sulfation Promotes the Performance of the Sulfated CeO2 Catalyst for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3: Redox Property versus Acidity2021 · 67 citations