PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1978IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering216 citations

Limited Lead Selection for Estimation of Body Surface Potential Maps in Electrocardiography

View Full Paper
RLRobert L. LuxCSCreig R. SmithRWRoland F. Wyatt

Key Result

Using an optimal selection of 30 leads to estimate body surface potential maps yielded an average rms error of 32 μV and an average correlation coefficient of 0.983.

Structured PICO

Does an algorithm for optimal selection of a limited number of leads accurately estimate body surface potential maps compared to total lead maps in human subjects?

P
Population
132 human subjects with normal and abnormal ECGs used to evaluate an algorithm for optimal selection of limited ECG leads.
E
Exposure
Algorithm for optimal selection of a limited number of leads (30 leads) for estimation of body surface potential maps
C
Comparator
Total lead maps
O
Outcome
Estimation of body surface potentials evaluated using rms error, mean correlation coefficient between limited lead and total lead maps, and error to signal power ratiosurrogate

A limited 30-lead system can accurately estimate full body surface potential maps, offering a practical approach for clinical use.

Abstract

Body surface potential mapping has shown promise as a technique to improve the resolution and accuracy of diagnostic electrocardiography, but the cost and effort required to obtain maps have made wide spread use impractical. As a step toward a practical system, the problems of redundancy and uniqueness of electrocardiographic signal information contained in large numbers of leads were investigated. An algorithm for optimal selection of a limited number of leads was developed. Data obtained from 132 human subjects including some with normal electrocardiograms (ECG) as well as some with abnormal ECGs, were used in the study. Estimation of body surface potentials from limited leads was evaluated using three criteria, including rms error, mean correlation coefficient between limited lead and total lead maps, and error to signal power ratio. Using 30 leads the average rms error was 32 μV, average correlation coefficient was .983 and noise to signal power was 3.5% in the presence of 20 μV rms noise. Another finding was that optimal sites are not unique, i.e., different sets of optimal sites may be found which perform equally well. This result has practical implications for the design of lead systems for estimating maps on the critically ill and on patients undergoing stress tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lux et al. (1978) studied Normal and abnormal electrocardiograms (n=132). Algorithm for optimal selection of a limited number of leads (30 leads) vs. Total lead maps was evaluated on Estimation of body surface potentials evaluated by rms error, mean correlation coefficient, and error to signal power ratio. Using an optimal selection of 30 leads to estimate body surface potential maps yielded an average rms error of 32 μV and an average correlation coefficient of 0.983.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a239011b7e293e61ca5f33ahttps://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1978.326332
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Body-surface maps of heart potentials: tentative localization of pre-excited areas in forty-two Wolff-Parkinson-White patients.1976 · 101 citations
  2. 2A Study of the Human Heart as a Multiple Dipole Electrical Source1969 · 61 citations
  3. 3A Study of the Human Heart as a Multiple Dipole Electrical Source1969 · 51 citations
  4. 4Body Surface Potential Distribution: Comparison Of Naturally And Artificially Produced Signals As Analyzed By Digital Computer1963 · 98 citations
  5. 5Selection of the Number and Positions of Measuring Locations for Electrocardiography1971 · 184 citations