PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2026Radiation Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

VRVolker RudatJLJing LiRZRuping Zhao

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the outcomes of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients either ineligible for surgery or requiring palliative care.
  • Evaluated patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy or hypofractionated/conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.
  • Patients selected based on specific criteria for curative (n=33) or palliative (n=60) intent.
  • Survival analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods.
  • 1-year overall survival rate was 100% for curative intent and 63% for palliative intent treatments.
  • 2-year overall survival rate was 76% for curative intent and 31% for palliative intent.
  • 3-year overall survival rate was 65% for curative intent and 11% for palliative intent.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technical advances and a better understanding of liver tolerance have changed the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of liver cancer. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of radiotherapy with curative intent in patients ineligible for surgery and palliative intent in patients with advanced disease. METHODS: Patients were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hypofractionated radiotherapy, or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Patients with a solitary liver tumor, no vascular invasion, Child-Pugh class A, and no extrahepatic tumors at the time of radiotherapy were considered for radiotherapy with curative intent, and the remaining patients for radiotherapy with palliative intent. Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to evaluate overall survival. RESULTS: Between 04/2019 and 08/2022, 93 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were treated external beam radiotherapy in our department. A total of 94.6% of the patients had received prior treatment. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates of patients treated with curative intent (n = 33) were 100%, 76%, and 65%, respectively, and those treated with palliative intent (n = 60) 63%, 31%, and 11%, respectively. No acute radiation reactions of grade ≥ 3 (CTCAE v5.0) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that radiotherapy is an effective treatment option with curative intent for selected patients ineligible for surgery, and with palliative intent for those with advanced disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rudat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23b96a71a5da9775e755f4https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02869-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines2023 · 106 citations
  2. 2Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Surgical Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma2023 · 8 citations
  3. 3Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus in China (2021 Edition)2022 · 112 citations
  4. 4Sequential Phase I and II Trials of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma2013 · 843 citations
  5. 5Setup accuracy and margins for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head, thorax, abdomen, and pelvic target volumes2023 · 28 citations