PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2026Bulletin of the Jusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University0 citationsOpen Access

A study on the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence and its influencing mechanisms among pre-service international Chinese language teachers based on the UTAUT model

CMChunyan MaJCJing ChenXLXiangpeng Lu

Key Points

  • This study examines how pre-service international Chinese language teachers accept generative artificial intelligence and identifies factors influencing this acceptance.
  • Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions
  • Analysis based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model
  • Pre-service teachers recognize the pedagogical value of generative AI as a teaching tool.
  • Performance expectancy is the most significant factor influencing acceptance, along with effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions.
  • Barriers to acceptance include technical limitations, insufficient training, and unclear policies.

Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, generative AI has increasingly influenced global language education. However, empirical research on the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence by pre-service international Chinese language teachers is limited. This study sought to investigate the acceptance and influencing mechanisms of generative artificial intelligence among pre-service international Chinese language teachers. Qualitative research methods, including semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, were employed, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model was used for analysis. The study revealed that pre-service international Chinese language teachers generally recognised the pedagogical value of generative AI, viewing it as a tool to enhance teaching efficiency. However, they also identified practical concerns such as students’ over-reliance on the technology, detachment from cultural context, and potential intellectual property risks. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions all influenced teachers’ willingness to use generative artificial intelligence, with performance expectancy having the most significant positive impact. At the same time, technical limitations, insufficient training, and unclear policies were found to be significant barriers that reduced teachers’ acceptance intention. Ultimately, pre-service international Chinese language teachers exhibited a dual-track acceptance attitude, balancing instrumental rationality with humanistic considerations. The findings provided empirical support for the integration of generative artificial intelligence into international Chinese language education

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23bcab71a5da9775e77c4fhttps://doi.org/10.58649/1694-8033-2026-1(125)-86-101
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multidimensional determinants of generative AI acceptance in foreign language education2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Adoption of generative artificial intelligence in instruction: a mixed-methods UTAUT study of K-12 computer science teachers in China2026
  3. 3Exploring the perceptions of Chinese pre-service teachers on the integration of generative AI in English language teaching: Benefits, challenges, and educational implications2024 · 31 citations
  4. 4A Study of the Factors Influencing Teachers' Willingness to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Based on the UTAUT Model2024 · 34 citations
  5. 5Understanding the Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: A UTAUT2 Perspective in Turkish Higher Education2026