PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1998Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery73 citations

Effect of Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation on Outcome after Fracture of the Femoral Neck or Intertrochanteric Fracture*

View Full Paper
KKKenneth J. KovalGAGina B. AharonoffESEdward T. Su

Structured PICO

Does acute inpatient rehabilitation improve functional outcomes in patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures?

P
Population
Patients with a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture managed at a single hospital before and after 1990.
I
Intervention
Diagnosis-related-group-exempt (DRG-exempt) acute inpatient rehabilitation program
C
Comparator
Standard care before program initiation (before 1990) or standard care without inpatient rehabilitation after 1990
O
Outcome
Hospital discharge status, walking ability, place of residence, need for home assistance, and independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily livingpatient reported

Acute inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture did not improve long-term functional outcomes or independence, raising questions about its cost-effectiveness.

Abstract

A study was performed to assess the impact of intensive inpatient rehabilitation on the outcome after a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture. Before 1990, our hospital did not have an inpatient rehabilitation program. On January 1, 1990, a diagnosis-related-group-exempt (DRG-exempt) acute rehabilitation program was initiated. Patients were discharged to this program after evaluation by a staff physiatrist. Before 1990, twenty-seven (9.0 per cent) of 301 patients were discharged to an outside rehabilitation facility. After January 1990, the percentage of patients who were discharged to the DRG-exempt program increased yearly, from nineteen (17 per cent) of 113 patients in 1990 to forty-one (64 per cent) of sixty-four patients in 1993; this difference was significant (p < 0.01). Before 1990, the average duration of the stay in the hospital was 21.9 days. After January 1990, the average duration for the patients who did not enter the rehabilitation program was 20.0 days whereas the average duration for those who did was 31.4 days (16.1 days for acute care and 15.6 days for the rehabilitation program). There were no differences in the hospital discharge status or in the walking ability, place of residence, need for home assistance, or independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living at the six and twelve-month follow-up examinations between patients who had been managed before initiation of the rehabilitation program and those managed after it or between patients who had been discharged to this program after its initiation and those who had not. These results raise serious questions regarding the global cost-effectiveness of these programs for patients who have had a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koval et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2424e76b441dc601adbdachttps://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199803000-00008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip.1995 · 621 citations
  2. 2Dependency After Hip Fracture in Geriatric Patients: A Study of Predictive Factors1996 · 88 citations
  3. 3The Care of Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture1988 · 235 citations
  4. 4ASA Physical Status Classifications1978 · 1,975 citations
  5. 5Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture2022 · 310 citations