PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1987Heart9 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic stratification of patients after myocardial infarction.

DMD. MurrayMSM S SalihLTL B Tan

Structured PICO

Does a combined clinical and exercise testing risk stratification approach identify high-risk patients for subsequent cardiac events after myocardial infarction?

P
Population
350 consecutive patients after myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Risk stratification based on clinical assessment, routine diagnostic investigations (peak enzyme release, reciprocal ECG changes, Norris prognostic index), pre-discharge exercise testing, and beta-blocker tolerance
O
Outcome
Death or reinfarction at 1 year follow-uphard clinical

Abstract

An attempt was made to stratify risk of subsequent cardiac events in post-infarct patients according to a combination of the results of clinical assessment, routine diagnostic investigations, and pre-discharge exercise testing in 350 consecutive patients who were followed up for one year. Patients were classified prospectively on the basis of the extent of myocardial damage as assessed by peak enzyme release, reciprocal change on the electrocardiogram at the time of myocardial infarction, Norris prognostic index, ability to perform a pre-discharge exercise test (and test result), and ability to tolerate beta adrenergic blockade on discharge. Of the 50 patients with contraindications to pre-discharge exercise testing, 26% died or had reinfarctions compared with 9% of the 300 exercised patients; the 24 non-exercised patients with evidence of extensive myocardial damage or reciprocal changes on the electrocardiogram were particularly at risk. Similarly, among the 300 exercised patients, extensive myocardial damage, reciprocal change on the electrocardiogram, and ST depression on exercise testing were the major risk markers in that each identified at least 75% of the patients who had subsequent cardiac events. The 63 exercised patients who had all three of these major risk markers constituted a high risk group: 18 (29%) died or had reinfarction. Of the remaining 237 patients, only 9 (4%) had cardiac events. The 35 high risk patients with exercise induced angina pectoris or clinical contraindications to beta blockade were particularly at risk; 15 (43%) died or had reinfarction. This approach to risk stratification identified a small cohort of high risk patients in a large population of myocardial infarction survivors; it also identified a large group with a very low risk of subsequent cardiac events.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murray et al. (1987) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a247a86a2bdc3b666fc9867https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.57.4.313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exercise-Induced Ischemia in Mildly Symptomatic Patients with Coronary-Artery Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Function1984 · 218 citations
  2. 2Estimation of Infarct Size in Man and its Relation to Prognosis1972 · 711 citations
  3. 3A Comparison of Transmural and Nontransmural Acute Myocardial Infarction1974 · 134 citations
  4. 4Timolol-related reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients ages 65-75 years surviving acute myocardial infarction. Prepared for the Norwegian Multicentre Study Group.1982 · 461 citations
  5. 5Low-level exercise testing after myocardial infarction: usefulness in enhancing clinical risk stratification.1985 · 175 citations