PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026Endoscopy International Open0 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic performance of real-time characterization in artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy

RLRonja M. B. LagströmKBKaroline B. BräunerMFMikkel N. Frandsen

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an AI-assisted system in characterizing diminutive rectosigmoid polyps during colonoscopy.
  • Prospective diagnostic accuracy study conducted across four endoscopy centers.
  • Included 278 patients undergoing colonoscopy due to various indications, with a focus on diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (n=184).
  • Histopathology was used as the reference standard for categorizing polyps as adenomas or non-adenomas.
  • CADx system sensitivity was 93% (95% CI 87%-97%) and specificity was 33% (95% CI 22%-46%).
  • Positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI 62%-77%) and negative predictive value was 74% (95% CI 55%-88%).
  • Overall accuracy achieved was 71% (95% CI 64%-77%) with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.69.

Abstract

Abstract Because most colorectal polyps are diminutive and carry minimal cancer risk, artificial intelligence (AI) might enable diagnostic strategies such as leave-in-situ and resect-and-discard, provided it meets predefined quality benchmarks. We assessed diagnostic performance of a computer-aided polyp characterization system (CADx) in predicting histology of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps during colonoscopy in a Danish population. We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study across four endoscopy centers. Adults referred for colonoscopy due to a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), surveillance, or other diagnostic indications were included. Patients with inadequate bowel preparation were excluded. Histopathology served as the reference standard and all polyps were categorized as adenomas or non-adenomas. Several performance metrics are reported. We included 278 patients and a total of 772 polypectomies for analysis. For diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (n = 184), the CADx-system achieved a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval CI 87%-97%) and a specificity of 33% (95% CI 22%-46%). Positive and negative predictive values were 70% (95% CI 62%-77%) and 74% (95% CI 55%-88%), respectively, with an overall accuracy of 71% (95% CI 64%-77%) and a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.69. The CADx-system demonstrated high sensitivity, but significantly lower specificity compared with prior studies, driven by a high false-positive rate. Inconsistent findings across studies highlight the challenges in standardizing AI-based characterization systems. Our results indicates that CADx is a promising future adjunct to colonoscopy, but its current performance is insufficient for reliable implementation in resect-and-discard or leave-in-situ strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lagström et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250a9a7def13d035e1aa89https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2860-7702
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper