PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026The International Journal of Psychoanalysis0 citations

Gaza: another psychoanalytic perspective. Reflection on the work of Shmuel Erlich

View Full Paper
APAntonio Pérez-Sánchez

Key Points

  • Exploring the role of psychoanalysis in understanding group dynamics related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and violence.
  • Analyzed Shmuel Erlich's contributions on antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • Referenced theories from Klein, Bion, Segal, and Fornari regarding psychological functioning.
  • Discussed the effects of collective denial and moral responsibility in psychoanalysis.
  • Identified the oscillation between paranoid-schizoid and depressive modes influencing both sides of the conflict.
  • Highlighted the disproportionate impact of violence on the Palestinian population due to these unconscious dynamics.
  • Emphasized the ethical duty of psychoanalysts to address silence and collective denial regarding human suffering.

Abstract

This paper offers a psychoanalytic reflection on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, prompted by Shmuel Erlich's recent contribution to The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. While Erlich argues that psychoanalysis is relevant only to the study of contemporary antisemitism and not to the conflict itself, the author contends that psychoanalytic thought remains essential for understanding the unconscious group dynamics that sustain war and collective violence. Drawing on Klein, Bion, Segal and Fornari, the paper explores the oscillation between paranoid-schizoid and depressive modes of functioning, the activation of psychotic defences in situations of catastrophe, and the failure to contain guilt and mourning. These dynamics, although shared by both sides of the conflict, have produced tragically disproportionate consequences, particularly for the Palestinian population. The paper also reconsiders Erlich's reading of antisemitism, its moral implications, and the ethical responsibility of psychoanalysts to resist collective denial and illuminate the unconscious forces that underpin violence and silence. In the spirit of Hanna Segal's call to speak out, it argues that silence in the face of human suffering constitutes a moral failure that psychoanalysis cannot afford.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Antonio Pérez-Sánchez (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250ac07def13d035e1ac80https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2026.2615919
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper