PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026Land use and sustainable Development آمایش سرزمین و توسعه پایدار0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Urban Prosperity Indicators in New Cities of Iran (Case Study: Sahand New City)

View Full Paper
HGHossein Mohammadi GazijahaniHNHossein NazmfarAAAli Azar

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess urban prosperity indicators in Sahand New City from citizens' perspectives.
  • Quantitative research design with an applied purpose.
  • Utilized OPA multi-criteria decision-making model and PROMETHEE technique.
  • Employed spatial zoning method in GIS software.
  • Sahand New Town shows significant spatial inequality in urban prosperity indicators.
  • Infrastructure and justice indicators are in a favorable condition, while productivity and quality of life are medium.
  • Central districts (Phases 1 and 2) score positively, while peripheral areas (Phases 3 and 4) have low scores.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urban prosperity is one of the new concepts of sustainability, introduced by the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) in 2012 to promote urban sustainability and enhance welfare and quality of life. In this regard, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the status of prosperity indicators in Sahand New City based on citizens' perspectives and to examine how different spatial levels and zones of Sahand New City benefit from urban prosperity indicators. METHODS: The research method of this study is quantitative with an applied purpose and a spatial analysis nature, utilizing the OPA multi-criteria decision-making model, the PROMETHEE technique, and spatial zoning method in GIS software. FINDINGS: The findings indicate that Sahand New Town exhibits significant spatial inequality in the distribution of urban flourishing indicators. Specifically, infrastructure and justice indicators are in a relatively favorable condition, while productivity and quality of life are assessed as medium. Central districts (Phases 1 and 2) demonstrate desirable flourishing with high positive scores. In contrast, peripheral areas and mehr housing (Phases 3 and 4) are in an unfavorable urban flourishing state, having received the lowest net scores. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the distribution of urban prosperity in the different regions of Sahand New City is heterogeneous, and some areas benefit less than others. This emphasizes the necessity of paying attention to the balanced development of peripheral areas to reduce spatial gaps.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gazijahani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250bca7def13d035e1bd3bhttps://doi.org/10.82173/jlusd.2026.1222722
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of Happy City Indicators in Affordable Housing Projects, Case Study: Mehr Housing Projects, Aftab Town, The City of Parand, Tehran, Iran2021
  2. 2A Multi-Method Assessment of Land Use–Related Urban Health Indicators Across Neighborhoods: The Case of Parand New Town, Iran2026
  3. 3Explaining the Requirements for the Realization of Happiness-oriented Urban Public Spaces to Promote Social Vitality: A Case Study of Shiraz, Iran2025
  4. 4Enhancing urban livability: Analyzing Tehran through equitable land use distribution2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Evaluating the impact of Zanjan city’s economic drivers on the quality of life in peri-urban villages: a case study of Do Asb and Payin Kouh villages2024 · 23 citations