PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

From Prompt to Principle: Using Generative AI to Cultivate Research Integrity

View Full Paper
SOSharon N. ObasiCIChiedozie Ike

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how generative AI can be utilized to teach and promote research integrity among students.
  • Integration of generative AI tools in classroom practices across STEAM disciplines.
  • Strategies for critical evaluation of AI-generated references and comparisons with peer-reviewed literature.
  • Facilitation of discussions on authorship, originality, and the role of technology in scholarship.
  • Students showed improved understanding of source verification and responsible attribution.
  • Engagement with AI tools encouraged critical thinking about the accuracy and transparency of information.
  • Discussions on authorship led to increased awareness of intellectual ownership in the digital age.

Abstract

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT is reshaping the landscape of higher education. For many educators, these tools raise legitimate concerns about plagiarism, authorship, and the erosion of academic honesty. Yet generative AI also presents an untapped opportunity: it can be leveraged as a powerful pedagogical tool for teaching research integrity. Rather than viewing AI solely as a threat, this presentation reframes it as a catalyst for innovation in helping students understand, internalise, and apply the principles of ethical scholarship.Drawing from classroom practice across STEAM disciplines, this session demonstrates strategies for using generative AI to illuminate core aspects of research integrity. For instance, students can critically evaluate AI-generated references, sometimes containing fabricated or incomplete citations, to deepen their understanding of source verification and responsible attribution. Comparing AI-produced summaries with peer-reviewed literature can underscore the importance of accuracy, transparency, and the peer-review process. Finally, guided exploration of how AI blurs traditional notions of authorship and originality can prompt dialogue on intellectual ownership, collaboration, and the evolving role of technology in scholarly work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Obasi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250cbc7def13d035e1ced1https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20556320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper