PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026Gender Place & Culture0 citations

Geopolitics of care: rethinking through the contradictions of socialist social reproduction in Soviet Georgia

View Full Paper
SSSevinj Samadzade

Key Points

  • The central aim is to reconceptualize social reproduction in Soviet Georgia through the lens of geopolitical care and its governance implications.
  • Adopts a historical-discursive and interpretive approach using secondary sources.
  • Examines Soviet policies and welfare arrangements through feminist geopolitics.
  • Develops a scalar analysis of women-state and state-empire relations.
  • Socialist care infrastructures increased women's labor market participation while reinforcing gendered hierarchies.
  • Contradictions between care and control emerged as critical sites of resistance.
  • Historical formations of care continue to shape contemporary post-socialist views in Georgia.

Abstract

This article reconceptualises social reproduction in Soviet Georgia through the lens of the geopolitics of care, arguing that care functioned not only as a domain of welfare provision but as a key technology of imperial governance. Drawing on feminist geopolitics, a pluralised Social Reproduction Theory (SRT), and the coloniality of welfare regimes, it examines how the organisation of labour, welfare, and everyday life simultaneously structured gender relations and mediated Georgia’s position within the Soviet imperial order. It challenges mainstream SRT’s capitalist focus by relocating analysis to a non-capitalist setting where life-making was centrally organised by the state. The study adopts a historical-discursive and interpretive approach, critically engaging secondary sources on Soviet policies, welfare arrangements and history. It develops a scalar analysis across two interlinked relations: women–state and state–empire, showing how socialist care infrastructures expanded women’s participation in the labour market while reproducing gendered hierarchies, dependencies, and forms of state control. These contradictions are made visible through moments of resistance, approached as diagnostic sites where tensions between care and control become legible. It concludes by reflecting on how these historical formations continue to shape post-socialist imaginaries of care, dependency, and geopolitical belonging in Georgia today.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sevinj Samadzade (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250cd27def13d035e1d0d3https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2026.2683398
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Labor Power: A “Peculiar” Commodity2018 · 18 citations
  2. 2Embodying Feminist Research: Learning from Action Research, Political Practices, Diffractions, and Collective Knowledge2009 · 35 citations
  3. 3The Evolution of Soviet Family Policy: Female Liberation Versus Social Cohesion1983 · 2 citations
  4. 4Colonial global economy: towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy2020 · 303 citations
  5. 5Women, the State and Revolution1993 · 226 citations