PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

Social Relations and the Making of Urban Space in Informal Settlements: Everyday Appropriation and Public Space Production

View Full Paper
MAMuhammad Mashhood ArifAAAhmad AdeelNSNida Batool Sheikh

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how public spaces in informal settlements are socially produced and utilized in everyday life.
  • Qualitative comparative case study design conducted in Lahore, Pakistan
  • Data collected through field observations, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, activity mapping, photographic documentation, and spatial interpretation
  • Focus on understanding daily uses and appropriations of public spaces
  • Public spaces serve as multifunctional areas supporting various activities like play, gatherings, and livelihoods.
  • Use of public spaces varies by gender, age, and time of day, influenced by local social practices and settlement layout.
  • Findings indicate the need to view informal public spaces as adaptive systems rather than just planning failures.

Abstract

Public spaces in informal settlements are often viewed as congested, unregulated, or residual areas, yet they play a central role in everyday urban life. This paper examines how public spaces are socially produced through everyday appropriation, interaction, and routine use in two informal settlements in Lahore, Pakistan. Using a qualitative comparative case-study design, the study draws on field observations, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, activity mapping, photographic documentation, and spatial interpretation. The findings show that streets function as multifunctional public spaces rather than simple movement corridors. They support livelihood activities, children’s play, domestic extension, informal mobility, social gathering, and community visibility. The results also show that public space use varies by gender, age, time of day, and settlement morphology, with everyday practices shaped by the interaction between street layouts, housing forms, public–private thresholds, and local socio-cultural routines. The paper concludes that informal public spaces should not be understood only as signs of disorder or planning failure. They are adaptive socio-spatial systems that support livelihood, belonging, and everyday resilience. Recognizing these resident-led spatial practices can inform more sensitive upgrading approaches that improve physical conditions without erasing the social relations and everyday uses through which public space is produced.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arif et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a28fecb6f82f25be989c022https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125844
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper